From: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Add FTDI FT4222H USB I2C adapter
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:26:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a503fea8fdf4156526d473ee2208b42b896b50c1.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aV5aM4OgIeJtsxlb@zenone.zhora.eu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3259 bytes --]
Hi Andi,
On Wed, 2026-01-07 at 14:38 +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
>
> I did just a quick initial review.
...
> > +static int ft4222_i2c_get_status(struct ft4222_i2c *ftdi)
> > +{
> > + u8 status;
> > + int retry;
> > + const int max_retries = 512;
>
> why 512?
These retries are needed mostly when retrieving the status after doing a
write with the I2C bus operating at a low speed.
Doing various tests at 100 kHz, I saw that after a maximum-sized (512-byte)
write, up to 11 retries are needed before the chip clears its CTRL_BUSY
flag. But under certain conditions we may need more retries, for example if
I disconnect the SCL line and then try to do a write, I see that up to 64
retries are needed.
So I guess 512 max_retries is too much, but we need a value > 64. Does 128
sound OK to you? Perhaps I can add a comment with the above observations.
> > + for (retry = 0; retry < max_retries; retry++) {
> > + int ret = ft4222_cmd_get(ftdi, 0xf5b4, &status);
> > +
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (!(status & FT4222_I2C_CTRL_BUSY))
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + dev_dbg(&ftdi->adapter.dev, "status 0x%02x (%d retries)",
> > status,
> > + retry);
>
> whould this debug message be printed after the check below?
Not sure I understood your question. Are you suggesting to move the
dev_dbg() call after the check below? I put it before the check so that I
get a debug message even if the maximum number of retries has been reached.
> > + if (retry == max_retries) {
> > + ft4222_i2c_reset(ftdi);
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + }
> > + if (!(status & FT4222_I2C_ERROR))
> > + return 0;
> > + if (status & FT4222_I2C_ADDR_NACK)
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > + else if (status & FT4222_I2C_DATA_NACK)
> > + return -EIO;
> > + else
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > +}
...
> > +static int ft4222_i2c_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
> > + const struct usb_device_id *id)
> > +{
> > + enum ft4222_conf_mode conf_mode;
> > + int ret = ft4222_get_conf(interface, &conf_mode);
> > + int intf = interface->cur_altsetting->desc.bInterfaceNumber;
> > +
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (((conf_mode == ft4222_conf0) || (conf_mode ==
> > ft4222_conf3)) &&
>
> what about conf12?
As mentioned in the commit message, the I2C functionality is available only
when the chip is configured in mode 0 or 3. In modes 1 and 2, the chip
implements other functionalities, e.g. SPI.
I will add a comment in this function.
> > + (intf == 0))
> > + return ft4222_i2c_init(interface);
> > + return -ENODEV;
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-06 17:08 Francesco Lavra
2026-01-07 13:38 ` Andi Shyti
2026-01-12 16:26 ` Francesco Lavra [this message]
2026-01-15 14:20 ` Andi Shyti
2026-01-16 10:09 ` Francesco Lavra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a503fea8fdf4156526d473ee2208b42b896b50c1.camel@baylibre.com \
--to=flavra@baylibre.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®