From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C31C728D827; Tue, 13 May 2025 13:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747144507; cv=none; b=M7+uGvRCphJ/WJr6TNtYTru31J/5JGsvsm1gngOga41NBVP8rQg/GZ0k+OpLj6qTJEMUEbxZnwO5wXk098G7058cXZp6c6WcghiiqLtEYO0dLcNigVQ+Nx23pfIvHvQajUHlrmF6pX7HSScsa+7m9oGfOcNtFbSnwD/C2hk2m4Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747144507; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kKIjOmw+tzOAdv1WgTckM5jUXEQMA06F5Lq5DwBDtnM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=TpnzcvqFWKpRfvRl/UKgi17lNbbYeqbSF6Qq69atgwOMFYjGANTW80CWedlnM+U809GY4Ggs3o8sxVDx9Q5h3zUZRzLggyAz3GS09qvjpiotz7t0NGEmPW6o2+YYy0cQBGAKXCd8PMhoIhB4Qy8n4Y8NBDZh5l0jVuEfOt/MrPs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=UvzYMTzx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="UvzYMTzx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1747144506; x=1778680506; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kKIjOmw+tzOAdv1WgTckM5jUXEQMA06F5Lq5DwBDtnM=; b=UvzYMTzxM77+JjPozqRyuk2QTZS3RB0+44Fw76D+ne1CfdagPyxtg6mU YsPls7t7Eb3v+Koiu6VRqGqOlzRZdwkgYlY/MCxsTb2+aZ/hkbC5wHPaH bySYOW5AwVJ02/uXiY0PqjrDyzyxrKV2Z+SidlUeFbpr7AwsM0d+bQb9v UABRSIEiQdg8Y5QLuDVqGS/t8uoNs1rqyHrP5Coz++HXSPFWSRFQvMzrm eRvzY8RnM0HZHYx4ycj1iQ3UOv1dPKlkBmK7oqJ9MaYKqXl49hs8guLSE piX/g7CnNqcA50TkPaSJL9pYqHZzZEsNiEl9CZDh2X9DVhz+n5zAq4Kjy w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HRaNtO5MSDiAiaF3tjgCLA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: r5qlCw3ASMiDKccbN2qFVw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11431"; a="49108497" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,285,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="49108497" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 May 2025 06:55:05 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 7XxQKHkaTE6S7XI3NYacNA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0AYzIPiiTZKaWICIsKL6IQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,285,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="168649104" Received: from soc-5cg4396xfb.clients.intel.com (HELO [172.28.180.78]) ([172.28.180.78]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 May 2025 06:55:02 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 15:54:47 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe/ipsec: use memzero_explicit() for stack SA structs To: Zilin Guan Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com References: <170f287e-23b1-468b-9b59-08680de1ecf1@linux.intel.com> <20250513133152.4071482-1-zilin@seu.edu.cn> Content-Language: pl, en-US From: Dawid Osuchowski In-Reply-To: <20250513133152.4071482-1-zilin@seu.edu.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2025-05-13 3:31 PM, Zilin Guan wrote: > If this change is required, should I submit it as a new standalone patch, > or include it in a v2 of the existing patch series? I think you could include it with the v2, as it touches the same stack SA structs (if you decide to reuse memzero_explicit() on them). Thanks, Dawid