From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Prevent deferred probe loops
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:44:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a52c513c-ff93-4767-a370-3f7c562df7bd@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx-koKBvSXTHChYYF-qSU-r1cBUbLghJZcqtJOGQZjn3BA@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/10/25 19:32, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 11:35 AM Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> A deferred probe loop can occur when a device returns EPROBE_DEFER after
>> registering a bus with children:
>
> This is a broken driver. A parent device shouldn't register child
> devices unless it is fully read itself. It's not logical to say the
> child devices are available, if the parent itself isn't fully ready.
> So, adding child devices/the bus should be the last thing done in the
> parent's probe function.
>
> I know there are odd exceptions where the parent depends on the child,
> so they might add the child a bit earlier in the probe
This is exactly the case here. So the bus probing cannot happen any
later than it already does.
> but in those cases, the parent's probe should still do all the checks
> ahead of time.
Such as what? How is the parent going to know the resource is missing
without checking for it?
> Can you be more specific about the actual failure you are seeing?
MAC is looking for a PCS that's on its internal MDIO bus, but that PCS's
driver isn't loaded. The PCS has to be loaded at probe time because
phylink_create needs it, and phylink is necessary to register the
netdev. The latter situation is not ideal, but it would be quite a bit
of work to untangle.
--Sean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 23:57 [BUG] Deferred probe loop with child devices Sean Anderson
2025-06-10 18:34 ` [PATCH] driver core: Prevent deferred probe loops Sean Anderson
2025-06-10 23:32 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-06-10 23:44 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2025-06-11 12:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-12 15:53 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-12 17:56 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-06-12 20:40 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-17 8:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-17 15:35 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-17 15:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-17 17:14 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-19 8:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-06-19 16:19 ` Sean Anderson
2025-06-19 16:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a52c513c-ff93-4767-a370-3f7c562df7bd@linux.dev \
--to=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®