From: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
To: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>,
jgross@suse.com, sstabellini@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dustymabe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: fix warning when running with nosmt mitigations
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 19:44:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a541a64b-aabc-bb62-4cf7-da5004a756d7@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106004743.GA380136@tp-x1>
On 11/5/20 7:47 PM, Brian Masney wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 07:35:29PM -0500, Brian Masney wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
>> index 799f4eba0a62..4a052459a08e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
>> @@ -93,9 +93,24 @@ void xen_init_lock_cpu(int cpu)
>>
>> void xen_uninit_lock_cpu(int cpu)
>> {
>> + int irq;
>> +
>> if (!xen_pvspin)
>> return;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * When booting the kernel with 'mitigations=auto,nosmt', the secondary
>> + * CPUs are not activated and only the primary thread on each CPU core
>> + * is used. In this situation, xen_hvm_smp_prepare_cpus(), and more
>> + * importantly xen_init_lock_cpu(), is not called, so the
>> + * lock_kicker_irq is not initialized for the secondary CPUs. Let's
>> + * exit early if the irq is not set to avoid a warning in the console
>> + * log.
>> + */
>> + irq = per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu);
>> + if (irq == -1)
>> + return;
>> +
>> unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(lock_kicker_irq, cpu), NULL);
> As soon as I saw this on lore, I saw that I should have passed the irq
> variable to unbind_from_irqhandler() rather than doing another per_cpu()
> lookup. I'll wait for feedback about the general approach before posting
> a v2.
This looks good. I'd shorten the comment though: your commit message already describes the scenario. And change the subject to something like "Don't unbind uninitialized lock_kicker_irq".
-boris
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-07 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-06 0:35 Brian Masney
2020-11-06 0:47 ` Brian Masney
2020-11-07 0:44 ` boris.ostrovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a541a64b-aabc-bb62-4cf7-da5004a756d7@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dustymabe@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome