From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299F7C001DF for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 09:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231205AbjHDJqh (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 05:46:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50356 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231179AbjHDJqf (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 05:46:35 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com (lelv0142.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.249]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9BF230EB; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 02:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3749jpWa045691; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 04:45:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1691142351; bh=j3outbqF3n0j34Bjwkt+GPyn1jRs072Kiuc9MbhIqbA=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=dRq5j9nSsByHHBcNWZcrMdHgHp+id/9SIeD7UZfjrfILlGN51eAX8IhEa2ycTVcTD Dj2hy+MQnw9plXBC5/qYdbJiSk4hh0NzqrgZ2lBxGRKNA+H0wzEbW/jndA4X2BjhVf vBh7AKzb3bqyClEsPGnhiCwIuaZ5saLm2dpgOQpo= Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (dlee109.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.41]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 3749jpvu070545 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 04:45:51 -0500 Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 04:45:50 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 04:45:50 -0500 Received: from [172.24.21.32] (ileaxei01-snat.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.5]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3749jilx025112; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 04:45:45 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:15:43 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable PRUSS as module Content-Language: en-US To: Arnd Bergmann , Konrad Dybcio , MD Danish Anwar , Peng Fan , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , =?UTF-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4gUHJhZG8=?= , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Geert Uytterhoeven , Bjorn Andersson , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , , Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra CC: , , Linux-OMAP References: <20230804061811.3999129-1-danishanwar@ti.com> <5ade5d29-5d9d-0d68-c3d8-de61ca90bb81@linaro.org> From: "Anwar, Md Danish" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/4/2023 2:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Aug 4, 2023, at 11:11, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 4.08.2023 08:18, MD Danish Anwar wrote: >>> Enables PRUSS as kernel module for TI SoCs. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Christian Gmeiner >>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar >>> --- >> As an outsider, I have no idea what this does, and the Kconfig help >> message doesn't say much more either. >> >> Could you please add a short summary about what sort of hardware >> is driven by this driver? > > Any additional information would also help, but more importantly, > Danish please use a recipient list that has only the people on 'To:' > that would actually apply the patch (Nishanth and Vignesh) and > ask them to merge it, while having everyone else on Cc. > Sure Arnd, I will only keep Nishant and Vignesh in to and move everyone else to Cc. > The problem with addressing a trivial patch to a dozen people > is that often everyone will think that someone else will take > care of it. If you address a patch to just one or two maintainers, > they are more likely to either apply it or tell you if you got > the wrong person instead of ignoring. > > For defconfig patches adding platform specific lines, there are > two ways this can be handled: > > a) the K3 maintainers pick it up into a branch and send a > pull request to soc@kernel.org with all the defconfig > changes, from where I pick that up. This usually works > best. > > b) you send it to soc@kernel.org yourself and I wait for > an Ack from the K3 maintainers so I know they agree with > the contents as well as being bypassed as maintainers on > this occasion. > > Arnd -- Thanks and Regards, Md Danish Anwar