mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Zheyu Ma <zheyuma97@gmail.com>,
	Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] fbdev: i740fb: Divide error when ‘var->pixclock’ is zero
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 08:33:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a564f6af-31fa-79a2-72c3-578f2c095b23@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUiEo8q9x0C0x5zOM=ax1=S06=s0JjcJvZYD4aMGLmEaQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Geert,

On 4/4/22 13:46, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Helge,
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 5:41 PM Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 4/3/22 13:26, Zheyu Ma wrote:
>>> I found a bug in the function i740fb_set_par().
>>
>> Nice catch!
>>
>>> When the user calls the ioctl system call without setting the value to
>>> 'var->pixclock', the driver will throw a divide error.
>>>
>>> This bug occurs because the driver uses the value of 'var->pixclock'
>>> without checking it, as the following code snippet show:
>>>
>>> if ((1000000 / var->pixclock) > DACSPEED8) {
>>>      dev_err(info->device, "requested pixclock %i MHz out of range
>>> (max. %i MHz at 8bpp)\n",
>>>          1000000 / var->pixclock, DACSPEED8);
>>>     return -EINVAL;x
>>> }
>>>
>>> We can fix this by checking the value of 'var->pixclock' in the
>>> function i740fb_check_var() similar to commit
>>> b36b242d4b8ea178f7fd038965e3cac7f30c3f09, or we should set the lowest
>>> supported value when this field is zero.
>>> I have no idea about which solution is better.
>>
>> Me neither.
>> I think a solution like commit b36b242d4b8ea178f7fd038965e3cac7f30c3f09
>> is sufficient.
>>
>> Note that i740fb_set_par() is called in i740fb_resume() as well.
>> Since this doesn't comes form userspace I think adding a check for
>> the return value there isn't necessary.
>>
>> Would you mind sending a patch like b36b242d4b8ea178f7fd038965e3cac7f30c3f09 ?
>
> When passed an invalid value, .check_var() is supposed to
> round up the invalid to a valid value, if possible.

I don't disagree.
The main problem probably is: what is the next valid value?
This needs to be analyzed on a per-driver base and ideally tested.
Right now a division-by-zero is tiggered which is probably more worse.

That said, currently I'd prefer to apply the zero-checks patches over
any untested patches. It's easy to revert such checks if a better solution
becomes available.

Thoughts?

> Commit b36b242d4b8ea178 ("video: fbdev: asiliantfb: Error out if
> 'pixclock' equals zero") does not do that.

Helge

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-05  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-03 11:26 Zheyu Ma
2022-04-03 15:02 ` Helge Deller
2022-04-04 11:46   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-04-05  6:33     ` Helge Deller [this message]
2022-04-05  6:52       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-04-05 17:46       ` Ondrej Zary
2022-04-05 18:23         ` Helge Deller
2022-04-06  1:24           ` Zheyu Ma
2022-04-07 15:50             ` Helge Deller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a564f6af-31fa-79a2-72c3-578f2c095b23@gmx.de \
    --to=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zheyuma97@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®