From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] kho: check scratch vs CMA alignment at runtime
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 14:42:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5a1879f-32e4-4e7f-a209-6ec4826c937f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <asC15ISMMbHMwnHi@kernel.org>
On 03/10/26 13:29, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 02:02:25PM +0530, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>> KHO requires the scratch alignment to be at least CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES,
>> and this is currently enforced with a static_assert().
>>
>> That assertion breaks the build on powerpc once CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER is
>> enabled together with CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE or CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE:
>>
>> kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c:49:39: error: expression in static assertion is not constant
>> 49 | static_assert(SCRATCH_ALIGNMENT_BYTES >= CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
>> ./include/linux/build_bug.h:80:56: note: in definition of macro '__static_assert'
>> 80 | #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg)
>> | ^~~~
>> kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c:49:1: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert'
>> 49 | static_assert(SCRATCH_ALIGNMENT_BYTES >= CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
>>
>> CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES depends on pageblock_order, which is not a
>> compile-time constant with certain configs, such as
>> CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_VARIABLE on powerpc. The next patch in this
>> series enables KHO on powerpc, so the alignment must be checked at
>> runtime instead.
>>
>> Replace the static_assert() with a runtime check at the start of
>> kho_reserve_scratch(), before any scratch memory is reserved. If the
>> scratch alignment is smaller than the CMA minimum alignment, warn once
>> and disable KHO rather than continue with a misaligned reservation.
> Can we keep static_assert() for everything !powerpc please?
Yeah, that's a good idea. We can have a dynamic check for cases
where a static check is not possible.
Thanks for the suggestion.
- Sourabh Jain
> Like something along these lines:
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_VARIABLE
> #define check_scratch_alignment static_assert(...)
> #else
> static inline bool check_scratch_alignment()
> {
> ...
> }
> #endif
>
>
>> Cc: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
>> Cc: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) <chleroy@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
>> Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Signed-off-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
>> index 7c4d86daf86d..dc76dd6b74da 100644
>> --- a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
>> +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
>> @@ -39,15 +39,7 @@
>> #include "../kexec_internal.h"
>> #include "kexec_handover_internal.h"
>>
>> -/*
>> - * This is the minimal alignment required by deferred struct page init.
>> - * deferred_init_memmap_chunk frees memory to the buddy allocator, which looks
>> - * at the neighboring pages (up to MAX_PAGE_ORDER) to merge them.
>> - * If KHO scratch is not aligned to that value, buddy can access uninitialized
>> - * struct pages, which can cause a crash.
>> - */
>> #define SCRATCH_ALIGNMENT_BYTES (PAGE_SIZE * MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES)
>> -static_assert(SCRATCH_ALIGNMENT_BYTES >= CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
>>
>> /* The magic token for preserved pages */
>> #define KHO_PAGE_MAGIC 0x4b484f50U /* ASCII for 'KHOP' */
>> @@ -836,6 +828,21 @@ static void __init kho_reserve_scratch(void)
>> if (!kho_enable)
>> return;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * This is the minimal alignment required by deferred struct page init.
>> + * deferred_init_memmap_chunk frees memory to the buddy allocator, which looks
>> + * at the neighboring pages (up to MAX_PAGE_ORDER) to merge them.
>> + * If KHO scratch is not aligned to that value, buddy can access uninitialized
>> + * struct pages, which can cause a crash.
>> + */
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(SCRATCH_ALIGNMENT_BYTES < CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES)) {
>> + pr_err("scratch alignment %lu < CMA minimum %lu, disabling\n",
>> + (unsigned long)SCRATCH_ALIGNMENT_BYTES,
>> + (unsigned long)CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
>> + kho_enable = false;
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> scratch_size_update();
>>
>> /* FIXME: deal with node hot-plug/remove */
>> --
>> 2.55.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 8:32 [PATCH v1 0/2] powerpc: enable Kexec HandOver (KHO) Sourabh Jain
2026-09-28 8:32 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] kho: check scratch vs CMA alignment at runtime Sourabh Jain
2026-09-28 8:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 3:30 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-10-03 7:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-10-05 9:12 ` Sourabh Jain [this message]
2026-09-28 8:32 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] powerpc: add support for Kexec HandOver (KHO) Sourabh Jain
2026-09-28 8:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5a1879f-32e4-4e7f-a209-6ec4826c937f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shivangu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®