From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
jon.grimm@amd.com, wei.huang2@amd.com, terry.bowman@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] Introducing AMD x2AVIC and hybrid-AVIC modes
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 16:43:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5fe4ca7a412c7e4970d7c0d48b17cefcd91833c.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84d30ead-7c8e-1f81-aa43-8a959e3ae7d0@amd.com>
On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 20:20 +0700, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> Maxim,
>
> On 5/19/2022 5:26 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> > Introducing support for AMD x2APIC virtualization. This feature is
> > indicated by the CPUID Fn8000_000A EDX[14], and it can be activated
> > by setting bit 31 (enable AVIC) and bit 30 (x2APIC mode) of VMCB
> > offset 60h.
> >
> > With x2AVIC support, the guest local APIC can be fully virtualized in
> > both xAPIC and x2APIC modes, and the mode can be changed during runtime.
> > For example, when AVIC is enabled, the hypervisor set VMCB bit 31
> > to activate AVIC for each vCPU. Then, it keeps track of each vCPU's
> > APIC mode, and updates VMCB bit 30 to enable/disable x2APIC
> > virtualization mode accordingly.
> >
> > Besides setting bit VMCB bit 30 and 31, for x2AVIC, kvm_amd driver needs
> > to disable interception for the x2APIC MSR range to allow AVIC hardware
> > to virtualize register accesses.
> >
> > This series also introduce a partial APIC virtualization (hybrid-AVIC)
> > mode, where APIC register accesses are trapped (i.e. not virtualized
> > by hardware), but leverage AVIC doorbell for interrupt injection.
> > This eliminates need to disable x2APIC in the guest on system without
> > x2AVIC support. (Note: suggested by Maxim)
> >
> > Testing for v5:
> > * Test partial AVIC mode by launching a VM with x2APIC mode
> > * Tested booting a Linux VM with x2APIC physical and logical modes upto 512 vCPUs.
> > * Test the following nested SVM test use cases:
> >
> > L0 | L1 | L2
> > ----------------------------------
> > AVIC | APIC | APIC
> > AVIC | APIC | x2APIC
> > hybrid-AVIC | x2APIC | APIC
> > hybrid-AVIC | x2APIC | x2APIC
> > x2AVIC | APIC | APIC
> > x2AVIC | APIC | x2APIC
> > x2AVIC | x2APIC | APIC
> > x2AVIC | x2APIC | x2APIC
>
> With the commit 3743c2f02517 ("KVM: x86: inhibit APICv/AVIC on changes to APIC ID or APIC base"),
> APICV/AVIC is now inhibit when the guest kernel boots w/ option "nox2apic" or "x2apic_phys"
> due to APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_APIC_ID_MODIFIED.
>
> These cases used to work. In theory, we should be able to allow AVIC works in this case.
> Is there a way to modify logic in kvm_lapic_xapic_id_updated() to allow these use cases
> to work w/ APICv/AVIC?
>
> Best Regards,
> Suravee
>
This seems very strange, I assume you test the kvm/queue of today,
which contains a fix for a typo I had in the list of inhibit reasons
(commit 5bdae49fc2f689b5f896b54bd9230425d3643dab - KVM: SEV: fix misplaced closing parenthesis)
Could you share more details on the test? How many vCPUs in the guest, is x2apic exposed to the guest?
Looking through the code the the __x2apic_disable, touches the MSR_IA32_APICBASE so I would expect
the APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_APIC_BASE_MODIFIED inhibit to be triggered and not APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_APIC_ID_MODIFIED
I don't see yet how the x2apic_phys can trigger these inhibits.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-28 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 10:26 Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:26 ` [PATCH v6 01/17] x86/cpufeatures: Introduce x2AVIC CPUID bit Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-06-24 16:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-19 10:26 ` [PATCH v6 02/17] KVM: x86: lapic: Rename [GET/SET]_APIC_DEST_FIELD to [GET/SET]_XAPIC_DEST_FIELD Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-06-24 16:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-19 10:26 ` [PATCH v6 03/17] KVM: SVM: Detect X2APIC virtualization (x2AVIC) support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:26 ` [PATCH v6 04/17] KVM: SVM: Update max number of vCPUs supported for x2AVIC mode Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:26 ` [PATCH v6 05/17] KVM: SVM: Update avic_kick_target_vcpus to support 32-bit APIC ID Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:26 ` [PATCH v6 06/17] KVM: SVM: Do not support updating APIC ID when in x2APIC mode Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:26 ` [PATCH v6 07/17] KVM: SVM: Adding support for configuring x2APIC MSRs interception Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 08/17] KVM: x86: Deactivate APICv on vCPU with APIC disabled Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 09/17] KVM: SVM: Refresh AVIC configuration when changing APIC mode Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 10/17] KVM: x86: nSVM: always intercept x2apic msrs Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 11/17] KVM: SVM: Introduce logic to (de)activate x2AVIC mode Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 12/17] KVM: SVM: Do not throw warning when calling avic_vcpu_load on a running vcpu Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 13/17] KVM: SVM: Introduce hybrid-AVIC mode Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 14/17] KVM: x86: Warning APICv inconsistency only when vcpu APIC mode is valid Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 15/17] KVM: SVM: Use target APIC ID to complete x2AVIC IRQs when possible Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-06-24 16:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-27 22:55 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-28 2:35 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2022-06-28 8:59 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-06-28 12:36 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2022-06-28 13:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 16/17] KVM: SVM: Add AVIC doorbell tracepoint Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-05-19 10:27 ` [PATCH v6 17/17] KVM: x86: nSVM: optimize svm_set_x2apic_msr_interception Suravee Suthikulpanit
2022-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v6 00/17] Introducing AMD x2AVIC and hybrid-AVIC modes Jim Mattson
2022-06-24 17:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-28 13:20 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2022-06-28 13:43 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2022-06-28 16:34 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2022-06-29 7:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5fe4ca7a412c7e4970d7c0d48b17cefcd91833c.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®