From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com (mail-pl1-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA0D2F3602 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 17:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764265668; cv=none; b=hvMLZ6laDryJFooOCAco/qkzWexyUHi7i0ay/qs9qRxEGEhhHbUZQ8jsWYqOvj3yTWKZpbbnQvyp+3Yl1b0d4yOE1cFKY1NEg3a4zHNqhnxuoHZ4TkXAB9plF3ICiCuTOrKxNnfRInilYX0pDfoPPDPgY8ka95O07dl7gPYyR3A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764265668; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BRI81MYuXb7h8xyD8XLP96rM8Y/COrnSldLvFnFiQlg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=N33/sMAuyq8l++pXU++mPfK0NRDFfF23roNzW9TLaghzGU1OwOHFCSUOA7+Er73r45FUvfohO9yFwOrp2wVqNbyUp1IpwAJy5T9cRpCAjumFDRIGUAEEXs+GId0EvCMBJMJWm0FPDdnIl2wH1gRJjzRi07gAlZDkBZ4EWGcSQWo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=F0jYaSac; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="F0jYaSac" Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-297ef378069so11243325ad.3 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:47:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1764265665; x=1764870465; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BRI81MYuXb7h8xyD8XLP96rM8Y/COrnSldLvFnFiQlg=; b=F0jYaSacv9Wwc3reFEH83i4RcNwDcldXqFr4PIQ6HhaltnZhDhWw6Y5FmvrwukO/D0 1fUNLubZ/RC0I6Hfb/H5711FkrDBqxN2FMtpG0ay6VMMwlHFr5xCHqfUKL8u9Mj5JgVy bv3HqvYvL2Me+M3XnpwkhPYlDnB0bialuZlBbyzs7Xcaor3j8xwbSLwzNShdoIXMW2Vj pb//UTCjol9NfPB2PM0aV3dP7zvmyDu5YGKvyHI43S084ItDclo7Zs1b4pS5ERoDns8p 8boRltxeRXFg7zMEOqhdp+p9ahfxSivosGFbozvZ9rr3dHNqjZ+14vEcXfJhW7wKLm2Y fd2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1764265665; x=1764870465; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=BRI81MYuXb7h8xyD8XLP96rM8Y/COrnSldLvFnFiQlg=; b=eqa3HD3EK8ao5ZDVq3UhDRZ08TMYjlei85Hng3h279lkS6N9yWS4WLp5NzeWeIZDvl /qBOMGSN+X6PEE0M7miHLRh2dQmfL6ICOO0wx2e0zePRiTwQ543GNM5O61R78Fc/J//6 VYRiyl/VIW7UPOXnIjCq/yZbX+cyhHoGuJtdERaXG4za3wkKTlVMUaDIEYIFRL9TGLuC JiYsvbT2BCT/QC8jbrqHUlIq699iYbq52EKdXSRDjJbi3uZkXCYXWgErvjfSg31/Kjmi 4UsgpwTcKtO5PgFdZ52Nz0iCkp/DfZV6iYXULr450WFx0ppEDIOKO6oUE+UPdiSOl+XT z0lQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWYhSBudiV2gMzxoSBIsxA4i2NW4QEHr3yRqkRTsfi935dFU680RTOfGjw/D+Qjsja/DTApLAufpIgm0jo=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YweRKyQ26pUrqB7xb5QTppQjOcl0m9Xxs3wDHSGIc7S4itK5AYN kgYpS0akhatYq9yJYkUjQj6c7A0WN2c6eXNmgZHqRS+g78utZJ1ANDI7 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct4YeIlqDqVi5QecIJxsN23Cmg8yWHVTZijTYmF1kSMr+Xt7ttAC2Z1cVrtiDS 6el6EvC/6/zggDiDRwIUJH2iEClNtd8+kWEiq2anqjPUqgaUqQC8cUpD4VUbxq0kti1pKO5hdoP 7exUgawThmxgRx3HkAeSvh6GRZRGIAikFjuToG8j4b23wcJwglbMkJBcnO4SHLdtwC+YXz6IrzG llud99d7zxLQgEF7OCyhWAMAbnc6rHUTSirAzbsGyo9JoYRMAwfs8Cd8z2TvSchvPj4OszWNtgB hp+vlktC5yr6zXlmbNrKdouoW/LeGuN/M+Wf67Lg5hqeT+oG9zmj9w6RHpoy7F8osBpu1VEWYqK UIbud2FnLza74XFMC8aASs3a+lmVeSzpZlkjOwAg/kw4p+1ObFbJB/msSDXyKOJsOnsqqhobNtL AEsL9sHM5uhZ1NNTNWnE1GDacYxMHpNd5snwGA4XZ3g7wi4VDmJf7BWISuX/yASJdh72RfOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFQMns4p7mYuQDAf8KkttHI4Vx6NTBg4hreeujJapPT/8zqqg74Cep/q2QlnjNERCvMI0q1AQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2ecb:b0:26d:58d6:3fb2 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-29baae4ee0cmr142565705ad.12.1764265665311; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:47:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:ee0:4f4c:210:de47:e88:2ad3:8735? ([2001:ee0:4f4c:210:de47:e88:2ad3:8735]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-29bce40a5ffsm23791225ad.18.2025.11.27.09.47.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:47:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:47:36 +0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio_net: gate delayed refill scheduling To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paolo Abeni , Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , =?UTF-8?Q?Eugenio_P=C3=A9rez?= , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org References: <40af2b73239850e7bf1a81abb71ee99f1b563b9c.1764226734.git.mst@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bui Quang Minh In-Reply-To: <40af2b73239850e7bf1a81abb71ee99f1b563b9c.1764226734.git.mst@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I think the the requeue in refill_work is not the problem here. In virtnet_rx_pause[_all](), we use cancel_work_sync() which is safe to use "even if the work re-queues itself". AFAICS, cancel_work_sync() will disable work -> flush work -> enable again. So if the work requeue itself in flush work, the requeue will fail because the work is already disabled. I think what triggers the deadlock here is a bug in virtnet_rx_resume_all(). virtnet_rx_resume_all() calls to __virtnet_rx_resume() which calls napi_enable() and may schedule refill. It schedules the refill work right after napi_enable the first receive queue. The correct way must be napi_enable all receive queues before scheduling refill work. The fix is like this (there are quite duplicated code, I will clean up and send patches later if it is correct) diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 8e04adb57f52..892aa0805d1b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c @@ -3482,20 +3482,25 @@ static void __virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi,  static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)  {      int i; +    bool schedule_refill = false; + +    for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) +        __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], false);      enable_delayed_refill(vi); -    for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) { -        if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs) -            __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], true); -        else -            __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, &vi->rq[i], false); -    } + +    for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) +        if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL)) +            schedule_refill = true; + +    if (schedule_refill) +        schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);  }  static void virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq)  { -    enable_delayed_refill(vi);      __virtnet_rx_resume(vi, rq, true); +    enable_delayed_refill(vi);  }  static int virtnet_rx_resize(struct virtnet_info *vi, I also move the enable_delayed_refill() after we __virtnet_rx_resume() to ensure no refill is scheduled before napi_enable(). What do you think? Thanks, Quang Minh