mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/khugepaged: release contended mmap read lock after scanning enough VMAs
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 17:38:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6333eb2-d51f-4947-bde6-f61ef52efb69@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105-khugepaged-latency-fix-v2-3-4384bbfe4606@kernel.org>



On 11/6/26 4:57 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> khugepaged walks an mm's VMAs under the mmap read lock in
> collapse_scan_mm_slot(), checking for ineligible VMAs first, and skipping
> them if encountered.
> 
> It charges cc->progress 1 page against the /sys/.../pages_to_scan budget
> when these are encountered, however only checking this budget once an
> eligible PMD-spanning VMA is encountered.
> 
> It can therefore hold the mmap read lock for a long time if there are a
> large number of ineligible VMAs present in an mm, over which time no mmap
> write locks (and thus no VMA write locks) can be acquired.
> 
> Address this by checking whether the mmap lock is contended after every
> KHUGEPAGED_MAX_VMA_SCAN_BATCH VMAs walked, that is a quarter of the
> pages_to_scan budget, and if so dropping and re-acquiring the mmap read
> lock before resuming the walk from the per-mm cursor.
> 
> As the walk is resumed from the cursor rather than the VMA that was current
> when the lock was dropped, the cursor must never move backwards. A VMA
> ending at the top of the address space causes ALIGN() to wrap the cursor to
> zero, so treat such a VMA as the last in the mm rather than skipping past
> it.
> 
> This was tested locally with ~1M ineligible VMAs mapped ahead of a
> collapsible region of memory, and resulted in a reduced mmap_lock hold time
> of 170us down from 95ms.
> 
> This was also observed to reduce mmap_lock stalls in concurrent threads of
> a similar duration. Note that a reader re-acquiring the lock can currently
> steal it from a writer that is queued but not yet running, so the full
> benefit to writers depends on the separate rwsem change at [0].
> 
> Local measurements indicated no change for ordinary use cases, so this is
> all upside.
> 
> This work came out of investigations into mmap stalls when getting latency
> numbers for an unrelated patch series.
> 
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261105-rwsem-dont-steal-from-queued-writer-v1-1-275e070f426f@kernel.org/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> ---

[snip]

>   		if (!collapse_possible_orders(vma, vma->vm_flags, TVA_KHUGEPAGED)) {
> -			/* Unable to collapse, skip to the next candidate. */
> -			mm_slot->address = ALIGN(vma->vm_end, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> +			const unsigned long next =
> +				ALIGN(vma->vm_end, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> +
>   			cc->progress++;
> +			/* Check for overflow. */
> +			if (unlikely(next < vma->vm_end)) {
> +				vma = NULL;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +			/* Unable to collapse, skip to the next candidate. */
> +			mm_slot->address = next;
>   			continue;
>   		}

IMO, these changes seem to belong in patch 2?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-05 20:57 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/khugepaged: bound mmap_lock hold time when walking an mm's VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-05 20:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Revert "mm/khugepaged: remove definition of struct khugepaged_mm_slot" Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-05 21:47   ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-06  9:41   ` Baolin Wang
2026-11-05 20:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/khugepaged: scan mm's more efficiently under mmap_lock contention Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-05 21:48   ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-06  9:31   ` Baolin Wang
2026-11-05 20:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/khugepaged: release contended mmap read lock after scanning enough VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-05 21:53   ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-06 10:03     ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-06 10:29       ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-06 10:33         ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-06 10:49           ` Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-11-06  2:12   ` Vernon Yang
2026-11-06  9:29     ` Vernon Yang
2026-11-06 10:49       ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-06  9:38   ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2026-11-06 10:52     ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-06 12:07   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-06 12:23     ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-06 13:26     ` Vernon Yang
2026-11-06 15:24       ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-06 15:39         ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a6333eb2-d51f-4947-bde6-f61ef52efb69@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®