From: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
sshegde@linux.ibm.com, chleroy@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/time: remove preempt_disable/enable from arch_irq_work_raise()
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 14:36:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a64fa7d86da51f78743bee26e16ae155c43016c7.1778057685.git.sayalip@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1778057685.git.sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
A kernel panic is observed when handling machine check exceptions from
real mode.
BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc00000006be21300
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
NIP [c000000000029e40] arch_irq_work_raise+0x10/0x70
LR [c00000000003ffc8] machine_check_queue_event+0xa8/0x150
Call Trace:
[c0000000179d3c70] [c00000000003ff64] machine_check_queue_event+0x44/0x150
[c0000000179d3d30] [c0000000000084e0] machine_check_early_common+0x1f0/0x2c0
The crash occurs because arch_irq_work_raise() calls preempt_disable()
from machine check exception (MCE) handlers running in real mode. In
this context, accessing the preempt_count can fault, leading to the panic.
The preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pair in arch_irq_work_raise()
was originally added by commit 0fe1ac48bef0 ("powerpc/perf_event: Fix
oops due to perf_event_do_pending call") to avoid races while raising
irq work from exception context.
Later, commit 471ba0e686cb ("irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when
queueing work on the local CPU") added preemption protection in
irq_work_queue() path, while commit 20b876918c06 ("irq_work: Use per
cpu atomics instead of regular atomics") added equivalent
protection in irq_work_queue_on() before reaching arch_irq_work_raise():
irq_work_queue() / irq_work_queue_on()
-> preempt_disable()
-> __irq_work_queue_local()
-> irq_work_raise()
-> arch_irq_work_raise()
As a result, callers other than mce_irq_work_raise() already execute
with preemption disabled, making the additional
preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pair in arch_irq_work_raise()
redundant.
Remove it to avoid accessing preempt_count from real mode context.
Fixes: cc15ff327569 ("powerpc/mce: Avoid using irq_work_queue() in realmode")
Suggested-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
index 4bbeb8644d3d..a99eb43f6ce9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
@@ -471,10 +471,8 @@ void arch_irq_work_raise(void)
* which could get tangled up if we're messing with the same state
* here.
*/
- preempt_disable();
set_irq_work_pending_flag();
set_dec(1);
- preempt_enable();
}
static void set_dec_or_work(u64 val)
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 9:06 [PATCH 0/3] MCE robustness fixes and LKDTM powerpc enhancements Sayali Patil
2026-05-06 9:06 ` Sayali Patil [this message]
2026-05-07 13:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/time: remove preempt_disable/enable from arch_irq_work_raise() Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-13 4:30 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-13 5:35 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-06 9:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] lkdtm/powerpc: add isync after slbmte to enforce SLB update ordering Sayali Patil
2026-05-06 9:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] lkdtm/powerpc: add PPC_RADIX_TLBIEL test for radix MCE validation Sayali Patil
2026-05-13 7:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] MCE robustness fixes and LKDTM powerpc enhancements Sayali Patil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a64fa7d86da51f78743bee26e16ae155c43016c7.1778057685.git.sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®