mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sathya <sathyaosid@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"dvhart@infradead.org" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 4/6] platform: x86: Add generic Intel IPC driver
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:09:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6c43a40-9c47-330c-975c-cb60e63793a4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VftGZRoT6aFMD8Mi1GQ=846gwSWTsE-HU00+ijuTtgo4g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Andy,


On 08/18/2017 05:38 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM,
> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Currently intel_scu_ipc.c, intel_pmc_ipc.c and intel_punit_ipc.c
>> redundantly implements the same IPC features and has lot of code
>> duplication between them. This driver addresses this issue by grouping
>> the common IPC functionalities under the same driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/include/asm/intel_ipc_dev.h | 148 ++++++++++++
> No, it should go under include/linux/platform_data/x86/
>
>> +/*
>> + * intel_ipc_dev.h: IPC class device header file
> No file names in the top of files.
>
>> + *
>> + * (C) Copyright 2017 Intel Corporation
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
>> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2
>> + * of the License.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +struct intel_ipc_dev_cfg {
>> +       void __iomem *base;
>> +       void __iomem *wrbuf_reg;
>> +       void __iomem *rbuf_reg;
>> +       void __iomem *sptr_reg;
>> +       void __iomem *dptr_reg;
>> +       void __iomem *status_reg;
>> +       void __iomem *cmd_reg;
> No, you have to switch to regmap instead.
Do you want me to register regmap in intel_pmc_ipc.c and pass this 
regmap pointer to devm_intel_ipc_dev_create()
instead of regular mem address ? Please correct me if my understanding 
is incorrect.

But I don't understand how this change will improve the design.
>
>> +       int mode;
>> +       int irq;
>> +       int irqflags;
>> +       int chan_type;
>> +       bool use_msi;
>> +};
>
-
Sathya

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-22  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-01 18:13 [RFC v1 0/6] PMC/PUNIT IPC driver cleanup sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-08-01 18:13 ` [RFC v1 1/6] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Fix error handling in ipc_pci_probe() sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-08-18 12:22   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-22  5:01     ` sathya
2017-08-01 18:13 ` [RFC v1 2/6] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Use devm_* calls in driver probe sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-08-18 12:24   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-22  5:05     ` sathya
2017-08-22  9:45       ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-01 18:13 ` [RFC v1 3/6] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Use MFD framework to create dependent devices sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-08-02  5:14   ` Chakravarty, Souvik K
2017-08-02 21:59     ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2017-08-03  3:03       ` Chakravarty, Souvik K
2017-08-18 12:29   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-22  5:02     ` sathya
2017-08-01 18:13 ` [RFC v1 4/6] platform: x86: Add generic Intel IPC driver sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-08-18 12:38   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-22  5:09     ` sathya [this message]
2017-08-22  9:50       ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-01 18:13 ` [RFC v1 5/6] platform/x86: intel_punit_ipc: Use generic intel ipc device calls sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-08-01 18:13 ` [RFC v1 6/6] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Use generic Intel IPC " sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2017-08-06 18:37 ` [RFC v1 0/6] PMC/PUNIT IPC driver cleanup Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-18 12:44 ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a6c43a40-9c47-330c-975c-cb60e63793a4@gmail.com \
    --to=sathyaosid@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qipeng.zha@intel.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®