mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, roger.pau@citrix.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: Use the bitmap API when applicable
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 16:04:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6dd44e2-6ea6-d085-0131-1e9bac49461a@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e9291c6-48bb-88e5-37dc-f604cfa4c4db@wanadoo.fr>


On 12/3/21 10:54 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 03/12/2021 à 04:03, Joe Perches a écrit :
>> On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 20:07 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> Le 02/12/2021 à 19:16, Joe Perches a écrit :
>>>> On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 19:12 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>>>> Le 02/12/2021 à 07:12, Juergen Gross a écrit :
>>>>>> On 01.12.21 22:10, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>>>>>> Use 'bitmap_zalloc()' to simplify code, improve the semantic and avoid
>>>>>>> some open-coded arithmetic in allocator arguments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also change the corresponding 'kfree()' into 'bitmap_free()' to keep
>>>>>>> consistency.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Use 'bitmap_copy()' to avoid an explicit 'memcpy()'
>>>> []
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>>>> []
>>>>>>> @@ -442,16 +442,14 @@ static int xlbd_reserve_minors(unsigned int
>>>>>>> minor, unsigned int nr)
>>>>>>>         if (end > nr_minors) {
>>>>>>>             unsigned long *bitmap, *old;
>>>>>>> -        bitmap = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(end), sizeof(*bitmap),
>>>>>>> -                 GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>>> +        bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(end, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>>>             if (bitmap == NULL)
>>>>>>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>>>             spin_lock(&minor_lock);
>>>>>>>             if (end > nr_minors) {
>>>>>>>                 old = minors;
>>>>>>> -            memcpy(bitmap, minors,
>>>>>>> -                   BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_minors) * sizeof(*bitmap));
>>>>>>> +            bitmap_copy(bitmap, minors, nr_minors);
>>>>>>>                 minors = bitmap;
>>>>>>>                 nr_minors = BITS_TO_LONGS(end) * BITS_PER_LONG;
>>>>
>>>>         nr_minors = end;
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No,
>>> My understanding of the code is that if we lack space (end > nr_minors),
>>> we need to allocate more. In such a case, we want to keep track of what
>>> we have allocated, not what we needed.
>>> The "padding" bits in the "long align" allocation, can be used later.
>>
>>>
>>> first call
>>> ----------
>>> end = 65
>>> nr_minors = 63
>>>
>>> --> we need some space
>>> --> we allocate 2 longs = 128 bits
>>> --> we now use 65 bits of these 128 bits
>>
>> or 96, 32 or 64 bit longs remember.
>
> 32 and 64 for sure, but I was not aware of 96. On which arch?
>
>>
>>>
>>> new call
>>> --------
>>> end = 68
>>> nr_minors = 128 (from previous call)
>>
>> The initial allocation is now bitmap_zalloc which
>> specifies only bits and the nr_minors is then in
>> BITS_TO_LONGS(bits) * BITS_PER_LONG
>>
>> Perhaps that assumes too much about the internal
>> implementation of bitmap_alloc
>>
>>
>
> I get your point now, and I agree with you.
>
> Maybe something as what is done in mc-entity.c?
> Explicitly require more bits (which will be allocated anyway), instead of taking advantage (read "hoping") that it will be done.
>
> Could be:
>
> @@ -440,26 +440,25 @@ static int xlbd_reserve_minors(unsigned int minor, unsigned int nr)
>      int rc;
>
>      if (end > nr_minors) {
>          unsigned long *bitmap, *old;
>
> -        bitmap = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(end), sizeof(*bitmap),
> -                 GFP_KERNEL);
> +        end = ALIGN(end, BITS_PER_LONG);
> +        bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(end, GFP_KERNEL);
>          if (bitmap == NULL)
>              return -ENOMEM;
>
>          spin_lock(&minor_lock);
>          if (end > nr_minors) {
>              old = minors;
> -            memcpy(bitmap, minors,
> -                   BITS_TO_LONGS(nr_minors) * sizeof(*bitmap));
> +            bitmap_copy(bitmap, minors, nr_minors);
>              minors = bitmap;
> -            nr_minors = BITS_TO_LONGS(end) * BITS_PER_LONG;
> +            nr_minors = end;
>          } else
>              old = bitmap;
>          spin_unlock(&minor_lock);
> -        kfree(old);
> +        bitmap_free(old);
>      }
>
>      spin_lock(&minor_lock);
>      if (find_next_bit(minors, end, minor) >= end) {


I don't think this will work anymore, we may now fail if another thread gets a minor above the original (i.e. no aligned) @end.


-boris


> bitmap_set(minors, minor, nr);
> @@ -2608,11 +2607,11 @@ static void __exit xlblk_exit(void)
>  {
>      cancel_delayed_work_sync(&blkfront_work);
>
>      xenbus_unregister_driver(&blkfront_driver);
>      unregister_blkdev(XENVBD_MAJOR, DEV_NAME);
> -    kfree(minors);
> +    bitmap_free(minors);
>  }
>  module_exit(xlblk_exit);
>
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xen virtual block device frontend");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-03 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-01 21:10 Christophe JAILLET
2021-12-02  6:12 ` Juergen Gross
2021-12-02 18:12   ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-12-02 18:16     ` Joe Perches
2021-12-02 19:07       ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-12-03  3:03         ` Joe Perches
2021-12-03 15:54           ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-12-03 16:10             ` Joe Perches
2021-12-03 21:04             ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2021-12-04  6:57               ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-12-04  7:05                 ` Joe Perches
2021-12-06 13:31                 ` Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a6dd44e2-6ea6-d085-0131-1e9bac49461a@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®