From: 王贇 <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "net: fix NULL pointer reference in cipso_v4_doi_free"
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 10:31:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a732f080-1d72-d1ee-4eea-5266b5ad1447@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhR2c=HYdWmz-At0+7RexUBjQHktv3ypHmFU2jD5gDc2Cw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2021/9/3 上午10:15, Paul Moore wrote:
[snip]
>> both v1 and v2 are there with the same description and both code modification
>> are applied.
>>
>> We want revert v1 but not in a revert patch style, then do you suggest
>> send a normal patch to do the code revert?
>
> It sounds like DaveM wants you to create a normal (not a revert) patch
> that removes the v1 changes while leaving the v2 changes intact. In
> the patch description you can mention that v1 was merged as a mistake
> and that v2 is the correct fix (provide commit IDs for each in your
> commit description using the usual 12-char hash snippet followed by
> the subject in parens-and-quotes).
Thanks for the kindly explain, I've sent:
[PATCH] net: remove the unnecessary check in cipso_v4_doi_free
Which actually revert the v1 and mentioned v2 fixed the root casue,
Would you please take a look see if that is helpful?
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-03 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-26 3:42 [PATCH] net: fix NULL pointer reference in cipso_v4_doi_free 王贇
2021-08-27 0:09 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-30 10:20 ` 王贇
2021-08-30 10:14 ` 王贇
2021-08-30 10:28 ` [PATCH v2] " 王贇
2021-08-30 11:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-08-30 14:17 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-30 16:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-30 16:50 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-31 2:41 ` 王贇
2021-08-31 13:48 ` Paul Moore
2021-09-01 1:51 ` 王贇
2021-09-01 9:30 ` David Miller
2021-09-01 9:41 ` 王贇
2021-09-01 10:45 ` David Miller
2021-09-02 3:04 ` 王贇
2021-09-01 2:18 ` [PATCH] Revert "net: fix NULL pointer reference in cipso_v4_doi_free" 王贇
2021-09-01 2:21 ` 王贇
2021-09-01 21:05 ` Paul Moore
2021-09-02 2:37 ` 王贇
2021-09-03 2:15 ` Paul Moore
2021-09-03 2:31 ` 王贇 [this message]
2021-09-03 14:08 ` Paul Moore
2021-09-03 2:27 ` [PATCH] net: remove the unnecessary check in cipso_v4_doi_free 王贇
2021-09-03 14:08 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a732f080-1d72-d1ee-4eea-5266b5ad1447@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome