From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB23C43381 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FB3218FF for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="C1ep7qdT" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2395432AbfBNVNv (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:13:51 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:40176 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390474AbfBNVNv (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 16:13:51 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id w6so1761482ljd.7; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:13:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZChMsRAHP0HW2emBAI7wrSCyLQOM/tkfKHcmHmvItsg=; b=C1ep7qdToipEDkT2jKMT9jNz2FXvqu3KQwe+21P8CgtJTgc6amKRTbN9i3vSVYNJlz CQ3znWkxW3O8Ggt8hsL2CE7QtacdUqtBnsBni0Ia3urR7qgEfVcSbtpprmgVrpjf/4d7 TkBSnX+058N4h0cIhweRcoTEAhQbVY0pC/s0Wk00XOoJ4LU0oFqt4n6Ter/3C67dfisz HUAU2JyicSC4FxfP+LCeDj6agWU2YZzhcvS3vNIaD3+FSzp5BSHO4ydGVxA8TkHbD0S1 s9EK3kAkqzQScVQQCRabHzbdjwkyWE9cYgRNQWUVkqVLPB/V7HSezYTq2sP/nqhta4NN fuQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZChMsRAHP0HW2emBAI7wrSCyLQOM/tkfKHcmHmvItsg=; b=HT/C5RDcYJdeKQNK76vKvS4y4Rr3ZAVIbQq13wloZTPvvVNrIe1Us+cNfvRmSj6Sg8 PdyooDQsIoSYBrdNF4XunVd5bi/I4bvpPg66OUsVnxlevkZtoeqeoV8MN9ocNMbDqdGo hBxsGMEf9d2tCFuql5PEJ+djg7eotEKxFLm8X+CmUnswTTiq+/tKsyWHiZXK72m88e1Y 5SoIgydcxjCttA7Tr/jBEdHiXi3cc5qLE/89xvvOKaRNiejl3dJkzZUeMQ5sMO0mdzQg +inlKMyczeCNk4/b741dlQZPAKWoZj4Yyg6k+4qsftbqK9cu46lGDLpOsi0yLi83oZ3K gc2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZ+w1d+s1xJ4mAbPBbxer3rTpwrS67iUfE4+yYKDz3hyu1ycUoh o8NJ35k3+XLnWvYeRWTv3w8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbDAtYtvy96iV3PtirRgU0/KtP6QXw41bhY5PqPF1FwegsKKn6P2WlvxhJnWWyNwxQ/81Lsow== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5854:: with SMTP id x20-v6mr3620164ljd.31.1550178829521; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:13:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (chh67.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.31.5.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12-v6sm642176ljd.47.2019.02.14.13.13.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 13:13:48 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the leds tree To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michal Kazior , Pavel Machek , Anders Roxell References: <20190214144610.3672e9d7@canb.auug.org.au> From: Jacek Anaszewski Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 22:13:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190214144610.3672e9d7@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen and all, On 2/14/19 4:46 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jacek, > > After merging the leds tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) produced this warning: > > drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c: In function 'lp55xx_firmware_loaded': > drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c:217:1: warning: label 'out' defined but not used [-Wunused-label] > out: > ^~~ Thank you for the heads-up. It's my bad - I didn't use sparse on it. Fixed up the original patch. > Introduced by commit > > 905c2157dd19 ("leds: lp55xx: fix null deref on firmware load failure") > -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski