From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750754AbWGFSnk (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:43:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750749AbWGFSnj (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:43:39 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]:29295 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750740AbWGFSni (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:43:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Z+mxrXiIuN+FrFKWJ8M/+bk0PGTngig1qxe9p8FE/n2+WrdWDfoUBHLicXBoVfCEGYgDW4/rK+ppYHl2NsdwT/RLgUhpshhiuUY2T01ZipSLwQ0UtJEZJl7KoBtcdz5qe3Mc/vOfrSH58OGCK2STYnPhdMIHbmJhrwYJWCWFyQg= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:43:37 -0700 From: "Keith Mannthey" To: "Chuck Ebbert" <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: [patch] i386: require ACPI for NUMA with generic architecture Cc: linux-kernel , "Andrew Morton" , "Randy Dunlap" In-Reply-To: <200607061221_MC3-1-C44C-BE6A@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200607061221_MC3-1-C44C-BE6A@compuserve.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/6/06, Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> wrote: > X86 Generic Architecture (X86_GENERICARCH) includes support for > Summit architecture. Enabling X86_GENERICARCH, SMP and HIGHMEM64G > allows NUMA to be selected but that configuration will not build > because it requires ACPI for the Summit NUMA support. > > Fix: > require ACPI for NUMA support with X86_GENERICARCH > > update the menu comment noting this > > set default NR_CPUS to 32 for GENERICARCH (since it > includes BIGSMP and SUMMIT which default to 32) Good catch. With X86_GENRICARCARCH perhaps NUMA should always be on or am I missing something with how it is supposed to work? Shouldn't X86_GENRICARCARCH buy you the ablility to boot(correctly) on all the diffrent archs listed? Thanks, Keith