From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
Jordan Griege <jgriege@cloudflare.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf 1/2] bpf: fix skb_do_redirect return values
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:39:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a76b300a-e472-4568-b734-37115927621d@moroto.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5d05e56bf41de82f10d33229b8a8f6b49290e98.1690332693.git.yan@cloudflare.com>
I'm not positive I understand the code in ip_finish_output2(). I think
instead of looking for LWTUNNEL_XMIT_DONE it should instead look for
!= LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE. It's unfortunate that NET_XMIT_DROP and
LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE are the both 0x1. Why don't we just change that
instead?
Also there seems to be a leak in lwtunnel_xmit(). Should that return
LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE or should it call kfree_skb() before returning?
Something like the following?
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 11652e464f5d..375790b672bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ void netdev_sw_irq_coalesce_default_on(struct net_device *dev);
#define NET_XMIT_CN 0x02 /* congestion notification */
#define NET_XMIT_MASK 0x0f /* qdisc flags in net/sch_generic.h */
+#define LWTUNNEL_XMIT_DONE NET_XMIT_SUCCESS
+#define LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE 0x3
+
/* NET_XMIT_CN is special. It does not guarantee that this packet is lost. It
* indicates that the device will soon be dropping packets, or already drops
* some packets of the same priority; prompting us to send less aggressively. */
diff --git a/include/net/lwtunnel.h b/include/net/lwtunnel.h
index 6f15e6fa154e..8ab032ee04d0 100644
--- a/include/net/lwtunnel.h
+++ b/include/net/lwtunnel.h
@@ -16,12 +16,6 @@
#define LWTUNNEL_STATE_INPUT_REDIRECT BIT(1)
#define LWTUNNEL_STATE_XMIT_REDIRECT BIT(2)
-enum {
- LWTUNNEL_XMIT_DONE,
- LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE,
-};
-
-
struct lwtunnel_state {
__u16 type;
__u16 flags;
diff --git a/net/core/lwtunnel.c b/net/core/lwtunnel.c
index 711cd3b4347a..732415d1287d 100644
--- a/net/core/lwtunnel.c
+++ b/net/core/lwtunnel.c
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ int lwtunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
if (lwtstate->type == LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_NONE ||
lwtstate->type > LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_MAX)
- return 0;
+ return LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE;
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
rcu_read_lock();
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 6e70839257f7..4be50a211b14 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int ip_finish_output2(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *s
if (lwtunnel_xmit_redirect(dst->lwtstate)) {
int res = lwtunnel_xmit(skb);
- if (res < 0 || res == LWTUNNEL_XMIT_DONE)
+ if (res != LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE)
return res;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
index 1e8c90e97608..016b0a513259 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int ip6_finish_output2(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
if (lwtunnel_xmit_redirect(dst->lwtstate)) {
int res = lwtunnel_xmit(skb);
- if (res < 0 || res == LWTUNNEL_XMIT_DONE)
+ if (res != LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE)
return res;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-26 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-26 1:07 [PATCH v4 bpf 0/2] bpf: return proper error codes for lwt redirect Yan Zhai
2023-07-26 1:08 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 1/2] bpf: fix skb_do_redirect return values Yan Zhai
2023-07-26 12:25 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-07-26 13:39 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2023-07-26 14:14 ` Yan Zhai
2023-07-26 15:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-07-26 16:10 ` Yan Zhai
2023-07-26 16:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-07-31 14:26 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-08-01 22:18 ` Yan Zhai
2023-07-28 22:02 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-07-31 21:35 ` Yan Zhai
2023-07-31 22:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-07-31 23:01 ` Yan Zhai
2023-07-31 23:52 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-07-26 1:09 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 2/2] bpf: selftests: add lwt redirect regression test cases Yan Zhai
[not found] ` <3ec61192-c65c-62cc-d073-d6111b08e690@web.de>
[not found] ` <CAO3-PbraNcfQnqHUG_992vssuA795RxtexYsMdEo=k9zp-XHog@mail.gmail.com>
2023-07-26 10:30 ` Yan Zhai
2023-07-26 13:22 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-07-26 12:26 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-07-28 22:47 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-07-31 9:48 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-07-31 18:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a76b300a-e472-4568-b734-37115927621d@moroto.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jgriege@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yan@cloudflare.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®