From: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: "Jarek Poplawski" <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] timer: parenthesis fix in tbase_get_deferrable() etc.
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:02:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a781481a0705100232t72b3b20bmae9e9bb31a1a6d4e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a781481a0705100126x6a649c16ic26409b4ffe80ed3@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/10/07, Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> > On a 64 bit system, converting pointer to int causes unnecessary
> > compiler
> > warning, and intermediate long conversion was to avoid that. I will have
>
> Whoa! Hello, hold on, just wait a second there. Do you _really_ want
> an unsigned int return out of tbase_get_deferrable() or will an
> unsigned long do? If the rest of your code is fine with unsigned long,
> then I'd suggest something like:
>
> static inline unsigned long tbase_get_deferrable(tvec_base_t *base)
> {
> return ((unsigned long)base & TBASE_DEFERRABLE_FLAG);
> }
>
> I don't really know your code (so I could be horribly incorrect here),
> but personally I would prefer *heeding* to that warning than _hiding_
> it -- it's not unnecessary, it's telling you that you're *losing* data
> by converting a pointer (which is always unsigned long) to unsigned
> int for 64-bit platforms where sizeof(void *) == sizeof(unsigned long)
> == 8 bytes, but sizeof(unsigned int) == 4.
Oh well, pardon my obtuseness (I _really_ ought to be at least looking
around in the code before jumping in like this :-) ...
TBASE_DEFERRABLE_FLAG only {ab}uses the lowest bit of tvec_base_t *,
so clearly no pointer truncation issues here (you could still prefer
the unsigned long version for simplicity & style, though).
*embarrassed, goes for a cup of coffee*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-08 10:33 Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-08 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-09 5:31 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-09 15:59 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-05-09 18:29 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-09 19:10 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-05-10 7:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-10 7:57 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-10 9:29 ` [PATCH] timer: revert " Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-10 9:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-10 8:26 ` [PATCH -mm] timer: " Satyam Sharma
2007-05-10 9:32 ` Satyam Sharma [this message]
2007-05-10 5:52 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a781481a0705100232t72b3b20bmae9e9bb31a1a6d4e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®