From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762687AbXGFH3i (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 03:29:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760133AbXGFH3b (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 03:29:31 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.226]:64964 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751729AbXGFH3a (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 03:29:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XeEa/u4A0bRiCBer+0l8q6c3HEK0xrstXEBPi8p7ZrFr3s1YpeuwtEonfLtcCUWlELlk2S9C6MK9BtrrkjdcJcY2E9l+60zmYOpOqB+ErUMGBTDMW1aTXDLssfT5oUloox2EWemAVH78byvxxZy87sVD+ghQJRyged6Ly+Fqc7U= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 12:59:28 +0530 From: "Satyam Sharma" To: "Guillaume LECERF" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Libertas: Fix regression in cmd.c introduced in commit 18c96c3497aa871608d57ca5e08de3558159a6c9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Dan Williams" , "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Guillaume, [ Added relevant folks to Cc: ] On 7/6/07, Guillaume LECERF wrote: > [...] > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cmd.c > @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ > if (*enable) > penableRSN->enable = cpu_to_le16(cmd_enable_rsn); > else > - penableRSN->enable = cpu_to_le16(cmd_enable_rsn); > + penableRSN->enable = cpu_to_le16(cmd_disable_rsn); > } > > lbs_deb_leave(LBS_DEB_CMD); > Thanks for the patch (looks reasonable to me), but: 1. No point sending a patch without a "Signed-off-by:" line. 2. Changelog (a few lines of explanation before signed-off-by) must specify what was wrong, and why the patch is correct. 3. Always Cc: relevant maintainers or at least _somebody_ who _will_ pick it up. 4. Gmail has done horrible things to the patch as usual, use some other mailer or script. And in general, please read: Documentation/SubmittingPatches and http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt Satyam