From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934696AbXGRQgb (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:36:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932777AbXGRQgW (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:36:22 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.224]:24440 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933549AbXGRQgV (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:36:21 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VirTOQ3ys0Sbz7dv5LbQ950ixbC1YCiWu4lc+o5XTwe7ZE8cN/C1AkfHYFOjxU9ohSH+iHBY4DeRni2W11J1Z2j9nmlMMbukldOQtPx33g36tyDQGzqtE/MLDflSCORcxmoFYpBzn9LMGAaO7eXo9MO0qXb6dqsN4HLKSPbA8lo= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:06:19 +0530 From: "Satyam Sharma" To: "Tejun Heo" Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path Cc: "Gabriel C" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Christoph Lameter" , gregkh@suse.de, miles.lane@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <469E401D.2020506@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <469BC2D6.5090008@googlemail.com> <469BC34C.4080107@googlemail.com> <20070718071445.GI23568@htj.dyndns.org> <469E2A68.6010307@gmail.com> <469E352A.90909@gmail.com> <469E401D.2020506@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/18/07, Tejun Heo wrote: > Satyam Sharma wrote: > > Readability, fewer LOC, 308 lesser bytes in kernel image and > > faster for the common case -- not good enough for you?! Oh, well. > > Sorry, not agreed on readability. The rest doesn't really matter too > much and please stop making big deal out of this kind of stuff. Things > like that do matter but not that much. Mostly it's matter of getting > used to and there are many alternatives. Some people like things one > way other people like another. My taste might not be the best around > here but I don't think it's that awful either. You may find my taste > disgusting but we all have to deal with such issue, don't we? Whoops, I didn't mean to get confrontational, and certainly didn't make any remarks on your taste/etc personally. Just felt that the present code looked obfuscated, and submitted a cleanup -- the other things just turned out to be happy side-effects. Satyam