From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Polensky <japo@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf evsel: Improve callchain warning for s390
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a79daeb6-394c-434a-8896-a1bd48337f8d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fUM6gb9MY9Sm=QhC+Tc4AFt2=fdLbr4tES++AMQcxryUQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/23/26 18:37, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 7:43 AM Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On s390 the kernel uses s390 back chain instead of frame pointers for
>> stack tracing of user space since v6.7 commit aa44433ac4ee ("s390: add
>> USER_STACKTRACE support"). This is because frame pointers on s390
>> cannot be used for stack tracing. [1]
>>
>> This requires user space to maintain a s390 back chain. For instance
>> user space to be built with compiler option '-mbackchain' (instead of
>> '-fno-omit-frame-pointer' used on other architectures, which should
>> better not be used on s390 [1]). Only few distributions and users build
>> user space with '-mbackchain'. Therefore '--call-graph fp' may in
>> practice not produce the expected results.
>>
>> Commit ca76fb67ebdd ("perf evlist: Improve default event for s390")
>> changed the default '-g' option to 'dwarf' on s390 and added a warning
>> for s390 that wrongly claimed that "Framepointer unwinding lacks kernel
>> support". This warning resulted from a misinterpretation of comments
>> in s390 cpumsf_pmu_event_init().
>>
>> The restriction in cpumsf_pmu_event_init() applies to callchain sampling
>> with the s390 CPU Measurement Sampling Facility (CPUMSF) hardware PMU.
>> CPUMSF events, such as 'cycles', do not support callchain sampling.
>> This is independent of whether perf uses the 'fp' or 'dwarf' call-graph
>> mode. The CPUMSF PMU provides samples collected asynchronously, making
>> it impossible to associate a callchain to the historic IPs. Therefore
>> callchains can only be used with software events on s390.
>>
>> Remove the incorrect warning. The kernel supports the 'fp' call-graph
>> mode on s390 by walking the back chain. Do not replace it with a
>> hint to use 'dwarf' when the resulting callchain is incomplete. Such a
>> suggestion could imply that 'fp' is inherently inferior. The same
>> general limitation exists on other architectures when user space is not
>> built with frame pointers (i.e. '-fno-omit-frame-pointers').
>>
>> Instead, warn on s390 when callchain sampling is requested with an event
>> provided by the CPUMCF or CPUMSF hardware PMUs, because that combination
>> is not supported.
>>
>> Update the perf record documentation to state that 'dwarf' is the
>> default call-graph mode on s390 and that 'fp' uses back chain instead
>> of frame pointers on s390.
>>
>> Note that '--call-graph fp' may also be useful for other applications,
>> such as OpenJDK maintaining a s390 back chain (does not require JVM
>> option '-XX:+PreserveFramePointer' on s390):
>>
>> $ perf record --call-graph fp ... -- \
>> java -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+DumpPerfMapAtExit ...
>>
>> [1]: s390: Stack tracing using Frame Pointer, Back Chain, and SFrame,
>> https://conf.gnu-tools-cauldron.org/opo25/talk/Y3CVHY/
>>
>> Fixes: ca76fb67ebdd ("perf evlist: Improve default event for s390")
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes (jremus):
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Updated warning message.
>> - Rebased on v7.3-rc4.
>>
>> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 7 ++++++-
>> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 6 +++---
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
>> index 178f483140ed..dc72606cb25d 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
>> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
>> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ OPTIONS
>>
>> --call-graph::
>> Setup and enable call-graph (stack chain/backtrace) recording,
>> - implies -g. Default is "fp" (for user space).
>> + implies -g. Default is "fp" for user space (s390 uses "dwarf").
>>
>> The unwinding method used for kernel space is dependent on the
>> unwinder used by the active kernel configuration, i.e
>> @@ -329,6 +329,11 @@ OPTIONS
>> enable deferred user callchain which will collect user-space callchains
>> when the thread returns to the user space.
>>
>> + On s390, the "fp" method uses back chain instead of frame pointers,
>> + which requires user space to maintain a back chain (e.g. compiler
>> + option -mbackchain). Without a maintained back chain this produces
>> + bogus call graphs. In that case use "dwarf" instead.
>> +
>> -q::
>> --quiet::
>> Don't print any warnings or messages, useful for scripting.
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>> index d4cb455f4a7d..55297b8dab37 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
>> @@ -1092,9 +1092,9 @@ static void __evsel__config_callchain(struct evsel *evsel, const struct record_o
>> bool function = evsel__is_function_event(evsel);
>> struct perf_event_attr *attr = &evsel->core.attr;
>>
>> - if (EM_HOST == EM_S390 && param->record_mode == CALLCHAIN_FP) {
>> - pr_warning_once(
>> - "Framepointer unwinding lacks kernel support. Use '--call-graph dwarf'\n");
>> + if (EM_HOST == EM_S390 && evsel->pmu && !perf_pmu__is_software(evsel->pmu)) {
>> + pr_warning_once("Cannot use hardware PMU 'cpum_cf' / 'cpum_sf' event with callchain. "
>> + "Use a software 'cpu-clock' / 'task-clock' event.\n");
>> }
>>
>> evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, CALLCHAIN);
>>
>> base-commit: 93f51579e7df248780214094418f205253383cc5
>> --
>> 2.53.0
>>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
--
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
--
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt
Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 14:43 Jens Remus
2026-09-23 16:37 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-24 9:40 ` Thomas Richter [this message]
2026-09-24 17:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a79daeb6-394c-434a-8896-a1bd48337f8d@linux.ibm.com \
--to=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=japo@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®