From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC98246781 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776178949; cv=none; b=AhnTGD1oZgtwrI/T1YcC9NZZzf6n7CP5IfYxwHWBOWqrdVr6NDjzbOenDVWwGbdxFX3Fy/MblzoZVrpK4UYK3ttDrB7vV9RAboruZoNEo9WRHCznvo+vLU1ApcFRGjYyfJdJe/YY4jFUh9CMwTYhyjUDsRkphrH4MCv2K6oYdv8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776178949; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vW05K9AslGp6w7U3MIWn+OuTXBMpNiQZO0IXyd9u+HA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cHpTmuGatG/32jg+gjT2GVmWaQER2/zWl0CUYYqA4AbbhysUw7jHrdupvclxg3mXBoFmkGQfN/3JkXriCuejIpGMydoPP6wLpofANPfe+VHtX26hOYgpl5m0vumi+nL0LizKcfHhnIIkaAjCyslJ/eEsDhzwn+daPiY3dKbh8ZM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=X3JH506m; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X3JH506m" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21283C19425; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:02:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776178949; bh=vW05K9AslGp6w7U3MIWn+OuTXBMpNiQZO0IXyd9u+HA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=X3JH506mv0cWXcsjgVzgnDdyj1Sd5iMVhdr3HVdUqNe33JWVA3QmsIDg/Z5Z5C/JE 1aFyZ1SP6ezXyt4yTOBszqbaFFiW8An1bHd6nMqdYNL7+wjPK7E9Hos0t3wB4KE9o7 G1w3Vd2s4waKZXtzGfrm5j/fg2nuSW0ZcXZg/cODVDPFVDioMNBUHfnGNk1FNBETZa NhUXYOsaeSloA7ymKDtgeF4RWbbBb4DAmhWvlmX2fG+TJxbfWYeJ1/Jm+q02H+sHFq hN++0ee66fJUgebYi5XtlHWGHPNzFrjrwXeOyOiEeljw2XYa7HR8LL9CrqfaKHn2PA qBTA0COD6fdgg== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:02:25 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SOC FSL for 6.20 To: Arnd Bergmann , soc@kernel.org Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ioana Ciornei References: <69cdadd6-523c-4a79-8cb3-1deff5910699@kernel.org> Content-Language: fr-FR From: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 14/04/2026 à 16:55, Arnd Bergmann a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 14, 2026, at 16:08, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: >> Hi Arnd, >> >> Please pull the following Freescale Soc Drivers changes for 7.1 >> >> Changes to fsl-mc bus are reviewed or acked by Ioana Ciornei. > > Hi Christophe, > > This is really too late for 7.1: the merge window is > already open, and I see that all the commits have a committer > date of today, though some appear to be freshly rebased > and had an earlier version in linux-next. > > I don't think any of these are urgent bugfixes, so I'd > suggest you rebase onto 7.1-rc1 and send these again for > 7.2. Uhm .... Maybe I made it wrong. All those changes have spent quite some time in linux-next but the branch was based on the tag soc_fsl-7.0-2 that you merged into 7.0-rc5. This morning I fetched soc tree and saw that the soc/driver branch was based on rc1, so to avoid pulling 7.0-rc5 I rebased the changes on 7.0-rc1. Should I restore the original branch as it was in Linux-next until this morning and send a new pull request ? Christophe