From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <joro@8bytes.org>, <afael@kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
<alex@shazbot.org>, <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>, <pjaroszynski@nvidia.com>,
<vsethi@nvidia.com>, <helgaas@kernel.org>, <etzhao1900@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach()
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 17:57:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7ebae88c78e81e7ff0d14788ddff2e6a9fcecd3.1763775108.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1763775108.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
The iommu_deferred_attach() function invokes __iommu_attach_device(), but
doesn't hold the group->mutex like other __iommu_attach_device() callers.
Though there is no pratical bug being triggered so far, it would be better
to apply the same locking to this __iommu_attach_device(), since the IOMMU
drivers nowaday are more aware of the group->mutex -- some of them use the
iommu_group_mutex_assert() function that could be potentially in the path
of an attach_dev callback function invoked by the __iommu_attach_device().
Worth mentioning that the iommu_deferred_attach() will soon need to check
group->resetting_domain that must be locked also.
Thus, grab the mutex to guard __iommu_attach_device() like other callers.
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 2ca990dfbb884..170e522b5bda4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -2185,10 +2185,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_attach_device);
int iommu_deferred_attach(struct device *dev, struct iommu_domain *domain)
{
- if (dev->iommu && dev->iommu->attach_deferred)
- return __iommu_attach_device(domain, dev, NULL);
+ /*
+ * This is called on the dma mapping fast path so avoid locking. This is
+ * racy, but we have an expectation that the driver will setup its DMAs
+ * inside probe while being single threaded to avoid racing.
+ */
+ if (!dev->iommu || !dev->iommu->attach_deferred)
+ return 0;
- return 0;
+ guard(mutex)(&dev->iommu_group->mutex);
+
+ return __iommu_attach_device(domain, dev, NULL);
}
void iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-22 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-22 1:57 [PATCH v7 0/5] Disable ATS via iommu during PCI resets Nicolin Chen
2025-11-22 1:57 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-11-26 12:55 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach() Srivastava, Dheeraj Kumar
2025-11-26 16:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-26 16:19 ` Dheeraj Kumar Srivastava
2025-11-22 1:57 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] iommu: Tidy domain for iommu_setup_dma_ops() Nicolin Chen
2025-11-25 19:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-22 1:57 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_driver_get_domain_for_dev() helper Nicolin Chen
2025-11-25 19:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-22 1:57 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] iommu: Introduce pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare/done() Nicolin Chen
2025-11-25 19:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-22 1:57 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] PCI: Suspend iommu function prior to resetting a device Nicolin Chen
2025-11-25 19:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-26 21:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-26 21:51 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-25 14:22 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Disable ATS via iommu during PCI resets Jörg Rödel
2025-11-25 18:30 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-26 16:21 ` Srivastava, Dheeraj Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a7ebae88c78e81e7ff0d14788ddff2e6a9fcecd3.1763775108.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=afael@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=etzhao1900@gmail.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pjaroszynski@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®