From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752770AbdARPwX (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:52:23 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:61389 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751834AbdARPwV (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:52:21 -0500 Subject: Re: alpha: Checking source code positions for the setting of error codes To: Al Viro , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org References: <986573fa-e636-f864-14dc-5e65a31b454e@users.sourceforge.net> <20170118141103.GD1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky , Jan-Benedict Glaw , Matt Turner , Nicolas Pitre , Richard Cochran , Richard Henderson , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:41:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170118141103.GD1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xxBpXoYQO4QFiH6YNIjdh2zUdNra9+2LGo5PLGY3kw1dbYcm82Q Akev63Ur/3saPo3RP1bMatvq1tkfzqs591cpaoqxYhefynRE/m/wjhvLSYKsRuK0mRh0D08 w2f/rzNx6YecC8IQDZ+fV2xl1MoKJxPwnGflfxLzHNTZG6LU3In8WvSm+lf+InYbuu1zCTM 7iIy2sf2awUSRbcDUb95Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:1AerUsAYzlI=:2dx+PyCg1Ga2hU22H8ehaj sq2FFDngB2zWmKfBYkA3Ew/9ByTT303jaKzpcvTG5ZvZS81fkl1jvRLwIrK7rH3aIp8kmesSW no5/7zdpkr6AImjK5fEUeP+3RV94UBpa1Mx8DCY5GUcPPYhPENi2KW9JfVZp4kOhcHW2uQhta 1VnuEVWQF9kcWZJQ8INj3QleGUOb//g6zH3pq/zEmY6jJBCkLn+YXrdBuH2h0ekjXwsEhv0Wm TYXkqcDTF1ngMLsnOo/uUyHd/4umh4Rtt+cFOXPEeh5HjMAjHN/mFwLmY2G3rP8WSK2yQ7ab+ FcbXv+ADnMI10L0tqq05gIOpQhXv91xWqvPHItD2C2Zgu4NqtQpWy3ynXTVy5WNVWaNUbdWRr 96Blrhii9rSymT/Ivghm5ZXEsUKZqlFxJbyXU2H9OJfe551EbxhmFkEoIhDeG/nzVvGnDvzed uZVjiH1+Af33WDID1x1gjlY/uM+0y7EEzMUH0jBwnH/bMZngFY5ay8xEEGtwGOHkHqKztNw+G 73JNLIiADsjQOeMSvhUhxyawNfUFjJsr9yA9CX3wettfcgJX62jKmZeDDRSYshQasDt8lfovc YyZmfUf0JqzsZfxnTf9KxGaq2IYSJC9IdZ/H8lGwoMTVmYPHM3k2qRQzw4dPAEqn8Pm9fu51L ZXixsxFpyZBSx/x9qpknKOZjdg6JtPJ4LYQgzK1kFY7Cn0uzDGEoGRnoN8UGW+BYEda1biyFC Zl6uCkYqeNUk1lB9TeqHEUHEdLLB688K6DKOtFuhFhW4uxg+OCIDfH9Tow8YOjh1R5sxe2mnA /KuEAES Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> A local variable was set to an error code in two cases before a concrete >> error situation was detected. Thus move the corresponding assignment into >> an if branch to indicate a software failure there. >> >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Why the hell is that an issue? * Can misplaced variable assignments result in unwanted run time consequences because of the previous approach for a control flow specification? * How do you think about to achieve that error codes will only be set after a specific software failure was detected? > It's a common enough idiom, Are corresponding implementation details worth for another look? > and while these functions are far from being hot paths, > blind patches like that are very much to be discouraged. NAK. Thanks for your feedback. Regards, Markus