From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753667AbdAaCqY (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:46:24 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:33341 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752551AbdAaCqW (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:46:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Create for_each_event{_system, _file} macros for tracepoints iteration To: Jiri Olsa References: <1485765328-21787-1-git-send-email-treeze.taeung@gmail.com> <20170130090812.GD22029@krava> <20170130123858.GA11068@krava> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Wang Nan , Steven Rostedt , Frederic Weisbecker From: Taeung Song Message-ID: Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:37:41 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170130123858.GA11068@krava> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/30/2017 09:38 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:32:03PM +0900, Taeung Song wrote: > > SNIP > >>> looks almost the same as for_each_event_system macro, >>> what's the difference other than 'ftrace' check? >> >> Little thing. >> In parse-events.c for_each_event macro contains >> tp_event_has_id() function But this function isn't used in >> util/trace-event-info.c >> >>> also why's one 'file' and the other 'system'? looks >> >> Just, I follow the name of each function that use the macros.. >> >>> like we coud have just one macro in here >>> >> >> I understood. :) >> How about this ? > > > looks ok, but can't apply it.. it's probably mangled > I got it. I'll resend this changed patch! Thanks, Taeung