Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/selftests: Add test for event filtering on function name

[Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>]

On 12/19/22 15:35, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 15:11:39 -0700
> Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/19/22 13:57, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 01:31:08PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>>>>
>>>> With the new filter logic of passing in the name of a function to match an
>>>> instruction pointer (or the address of the function), add a test to make
>>>> sure that it is functional.
>>>>
>>>> This is also the first test to test plain filtering. The filtering has
>>>> been tested via the trigger logic, which uses the same code, but there was
>>>> nothing to test just the event filter, so this test is the first to add
>>>> such a case.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
>>>> Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
>>
>> Thank you both. I will apply this after rc1 comes out.
> 
> It's dependent on the first patch.
> 

In which case,

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah