From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=113.46.200.223 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794187042; b=bKqOPeDmxK0FZGl+qAxDuM4asbsTAsRiBdCkje3/poLiRjcQfVOJqN/2vi1S9p0UnGps I5yBTNIm+Q/JV7B9Kk3TiMfWVrPy7E3ZUj33vS0XCNN4iDAYJKntunD4FDgOXAOfheywN FfXfWlWQPSYAozzuH6IUlFUpvqzLc2ay7By79okaCb25KVwRc9xnWNY/68Gr4e9cDc9jN Hm59g3P/xpl5I3DlO/EgVD8Wm604gkWWHCcCfTJEkCBMBZCVnf+AFZ17f+AHApSEfkwJf uTQtLKTNEXYEhVj4SMXAUMe5ycX2yqe2h4R+3wF8LFMiGOKqOVcbMOxpxeLJ4q7Rteg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794187042; h=DMARC-Filter:dkim-signature:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID: Date:MIME-Version:User-Agent:Subject:To:CC:References: Content-Language:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy; bh=yY98EimkYwoSC4veLCocaKOPiAsfw8Chonm7o9A4A9M=; b=rrI70LFnWXYBteD4pRiuygm4mhXJqhhpW9dDgnaapdeAvVQU8m/XjQbhyqsKw7IraYTf y2myaMRgUBu9MvXAUO47pjc4p6lnfepga7fF6TFe42vGI5xKtXL5yfK1ChJ0HWHgDUQ+v iL0UzbSxiaSjFC+KDJbZ1hzPH0gfHsxjR0SlEactvJhRl/R66DyZ9Zoxzmu3C6fuKk4Z7 k1VHatVogjg4vrh1u7/FNzL3pAvxcJQNz/z73BpYpm5QggLCMgZeOyIODTPZSceqewBcE 7HfJg2wcURuu5BPJHLCz9emlsOwGQN3LZdrwCIe5807CHgDSSDXri/Eq3REErjo7sdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=qeQgFRRB; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=113.46.200.223 Received: from canpmsgout08.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout08.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.223]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02B39606A31C; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 01:17:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 02B39606A31C Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=qeQgFRRB dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=yY98EimkYwoSC4veLCocaKOPiAsfw8Chonm7o9A4A9M=; b=qeQgFRRBd00Rn4rcGiGW4cLpU42DjSLiYLuY0iPOxJjAWnf7mo7BPBywaBk6dbPUWAHU7dDoH 5Dk0lgW8/XEXIKaJb5jUbAbZdI6PYC+11Vcy1XbFjudWMWJwt82sSUOSfXtHgxtAMTm8KKQSI1X BOb9/Xsi3W61XFBYhWMjjPo= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.127]) by canpmsgout08.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4jNBhT4PhYzmVcF; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 09:16:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from whupemk100010.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.152.184.41]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ACDA40572; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 09:17:11 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.110.140] (10.67.110.140) by whupemk100010.china.huawei.com (7.152.184.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.45; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 09:17:09 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 09:17:08 +0800 X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/9] lockdown: fix the securityfs interface and add tests To: "Serge E. Hallyn" CC: , , , , , , , , , References: <20261103082421.3033195-1-caixinchen1@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Cai Xinchen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.17) To whupemk100010.china.huawei.com (7.152.184.41) Hi, Serge. Thanks for review. I will change these two patches and send v2 later. On 11/7/2026 3:55 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > In patch 3, it would be nice if we had a BUILD_BUG_ON if > the temp len became not long enough. In patch 6, I think > the original was nicer to read.