From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6836AC7EE2F for ; Tue, 30 May 2023 13:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232516AbjE3NDw (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2023 09:03:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33998 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232402AbjE3NDu (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2023 09:03:50 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49BC5184 for ; Tue, 30 May 2023 06:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4f4bdcde899so4802991e87.0 for ; Tue, 30 May 2023 06:03:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1685451819; x=1688043819; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LzBOsqpAKP1GRqHJCHjWzM7W2wtshKvbHikXn0UNJ+w=; b=g+GY++Kpi5N3bKfymnIQM842X84OVDlDN+hE3wY4F2UDq32bZPqdm4xzBkOKzUEIFE OlrcdAlziwNyx16w0vk/XHjiCc9HWdqZJmT5l9rEGAGIyJlFZUtWGQNHBdB6EgvtqV+5 hEBbIZnITz2FwK3kWe4x0ZM9Lxxj0l2j649YVBmvF10UZXAV91Fy8cw3KMA3zflJJzTY +FRtMtPlTe92w1im/HXgt0e8nJcH2LZXBqHd+zsBmskl7lP39bUMmkefU9lnmOSAb27+ t4fMOvi7Dk4AnzoYp2h2GwXWfy+omwEA2h2wj9/TQQpcy75uanJ9h4H6FdPhi1nKP8iu fZiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685451819; x=1688043819; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LzBOsqpAKP1GRqHJCHjWzM7W2wtshKvbHikXn0UNJ+w=; b=BJHhlbA5vtrkDTAVoD5bNOLcch1GkRWSIsDJeFTUkRDxdH9YRAKm2dteibRuBFRir3 GCW59V5L/lWv2fJAhsZ3gv+ZBjls0uHbfb/R2OyWAer+4WOlXUnf129xNZ6vvqyYZMhd dtksu09Wyc4qZFl5+OHiy0eGxS35QgG1Lc1dTnGxCoY7Fzs+YB+meRM70U2h+vZwUdJH EwLpMc3TRrOqv6inAaeMFvPn0CJEXqRM1slsxqtS4qiJcNP1b8VDea8m8J5sQ3hUrHw+ /4YiJJ3bFF6XGTf9xNmG97EqKdcx/Z0A7dz9YmLUTjGeiJlSGsacg4mnpfGyKTUjzRdG C5bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzVuDxHDlSxnpDh2pmE2umkl1A6LwF9UYP4z9/mF7gwc3fbMjbB 461nvq5lJ88UMrSthg1Sd5x4cQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ65QosLJ2p0+9l5Nwum/uDyPI90mQPSK+sfrYNDq2TI8JMX+RwDIAdHmNqeSqm9Bj5ej7UsfQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:53a4:0:b0:4e9:59cd:416c with SMTP id j4-20020ac253a4000000b004e959cd416cmr707366lfh.0.1685451819362; Tue, 30 May 2023 06:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([178.197.199.204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a21-20020aa7d755000000b0050bc041d2a8sm4313379eds.15.2023.05.30.06.03.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 May 2023 06:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 15:03:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] dt-bindings: nvmem: qfprom: add compatible for few IPQ SoCs Content-Language: en-US To: Kathiravan T , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Srinivas Kandagatla , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230526125305.19626-1-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> <20230526125305.19626-2-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20230526125305.19626-2-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26/05/2023 14:53, Kathiravan T wrote: > Add the QFPROM compatible for IPQ5332, IPQ6018 and IPQ9574 > > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T > --- > Changes in V2: > - No changes This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540 If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. Best regards, Krzysztof