From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: yangxingui <yangxingui@huawei.com>,
yanaijie@huawei.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com,
chenxiang66@hisilicon.com, kangfenglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: libsas: Fix exp-attached end device cannot be scanned in again after probe failed
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 11:11:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8b18cea-cc04-47d0-8ff0-b02dd087dc73@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12ea14e9-5821-b2b5-16c1-ac48985927d7@huawei.com>
On 25/05/2024 04:08, yangxingui wrote:
>> Why do these new additions not cover the same job which those calls to
>> the same functions @out covers?
> For asynchronous probes like sata, the failure occurs after @out. After
> adding the device to port_delete_list, the port is not deleted
> immediately. This may cause the device to fail to create a new port
> because the previous port has not been deleted when the device attached
> again. as follow:
>
> 1. REVALIDATING DOMAIN
> 2. new device attached
> 3. ata_sas_async_probe
> 4. done REVALIDATING DOMAIN
> 5. @out, handle parent->port->sas_port_del_list
> 6. sata probe failed
> 7. add phy->port->list to parent->port->sas_port_del_list // port won't
> delete now
>
> 8、REVALIDATING DOMAIN
> 9、new device attached
> 10、new port create failed, as port already exits.
>
ok, so next please consider these items:
- add a helper for calling sas_destruct_devices() and sas_destruct_ports().
- add a comment on why we have this new extra call to
sas_destruct_devices() and sas_destruct_ports()
- can we put the new call to sas_destruct_devices() and
sas_destruct_ports() after 7, above? i.e. the
sas_probe_devices() call? It would look a bit neater.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 8:08 Xingui Yang
2024-05-20 13:29 ` yangxingui
2024-05-21 11:47 ` John Garry
2024-05-22 3:51 ` Jason Yan
2024-05-24 8:36 ` John Garry
2024-05-25 3:08 ` yangxingui
2024-05-28 10:11 ` John Garry [this message]
2024-05-31 8:53 ` yangxingui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8b18cea-cc04-47d0-8ff0-b02dd087dc73@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®