mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: yangxingui <yangxingui@huawei.com>,
	yanaijie@huawei.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com,
	chenxiang66@hisilicon.com, kangfenglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: libsas: Fix exp-attached end device cannot be scanned in again after probe failed
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 11:11:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8b18cea-cc04-47d0-8ff0-b02dd087dc73@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12ea14e9-5821-b2b5-16c1-ac48985927d7@huawei.com>

On 25/05/2024 04:08, yangxingui wrote:
>> Why do these new additions not cover the same job which those calls to 
>> the same functions @out covers?
> For asynchronous probes like sata, the failure occurs after @out. After 
> adding the device to port_delete_list, the port is not deleted 
> immediately. This may cause the device to fail to create a new port 
> because the previous port has not been deleted when the device attached 
> again. as follow:
> 
> 1. REVALIDATING DOMAIN
> 2. new device attached
> 3. ata_sas_async_probe
> 4. done REVALIDATING DOMAIN
> 5. @out, handle parent->port->sas_port_del_list
> 6. sata probe failed
> 7. add phy->port->list to parent->port->sas_port_del_list // port won't 
> delete now
> 
> 8、REVALIDATING DOMAIN
> 9、new device attached
> 10、new port create failed, as port already exits.
> 
ok, so next please consider these items:

- add a helper for calling sas_destruct_devices() and sas_destruct_ports().

- add a comment on why we have this new extra call to 
sas_destruct_devices() and sas_destruct_ports()

- can we put the new call to sas_destruct_devices() and 
sas_destruct_ports() after 7, above? i.e. the
sas_probe_devices() call? It would look a bit neater.

Thanks,
John



  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-28 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-24  8:08 Xingui Yang
2024-05-20 13:29 ` yangxingui
2024-05-21 11:47   ` John Garry
2024-05-22  3:51   ` Jason Yan
2024-05-24  8:36 ` John Garry
2024-05-25  3:08   ` yangxingui
2024-05-28 10:11     ` John Garry [this message]
2024-05-31  8:53       ` yangxingui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a8b18cea-cc04-47d0-8ff0-b02dd087dc73@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®