From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755545AbZHEFRC (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:17:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755422AbZHEFRB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:17:01 -0400 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]:23373 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755415AbZHEFRA (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:17:00 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UkSfZ10l3vUBEwZCCb69rpKD9Wlor47ArIm+h+ER9WTfGjLbypHwDcmgepPdqmG3D1 PkB2RZZaF9/87UR4/q8l7ZMUPLdZ8hjpL0JXpmGbeQSmndUlYfcueJ6mY0qclvXeVr7M Kob3aKfKbw+ZmBM2dwiV2+xISszHf4U2SaWjY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1249405306.3094.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090803.132924.151782729.davem@davemloft.net> <1249343666.3094.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090803.191916.75688176.davem@davemloft.net> <20090803.211136.00343745.davem@davemloft.net> <1249405306.3094.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:16:59 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH]bluetooth: rfcomm_init bug fix From: Dave Young To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: David Miller , oliver@hartkopp.net, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Dave, > >> >> do you mind at least waiting for an ACK from my side. I haven't even >> >> looked at the final patch. >> > >> > Sure, I haven't pushed it out yet, so now's your chance :) >> >> Grumble, I accidently pushed my net-2.6 queue out before you >> had a chance to reply, sorry :-( > > not a big deal. Just have to send a cleanup patch. The patch itself is > fine, but from a style perspective it is different than everything else > in the Bluetooth subsystem and I would have liked to fix that before > pushing it. I wait with that for 2.6.32 since it is not important. Marcel, could you publish the bluetooth subsystem coding style somewhere? People including me are confused about it. I remembered I asked it from you, but it is still not very clear for me. > > The other Dave, please send patches to linux-bluetooth only and lets > follow the normal path to get them merged into Linus' tree. Skipping > bluetooth-2.6 is not an option. You have to use the same process than > everybody else. Why linux-bluetooth only? IMHO there could be more people to comment and review if I send patches to both lkml and subsystem mailing list. > > Regards > > Marcel > > > -- Regards dave