Re: + kernelh-printk-panic-string-cleanup.patch added to -mm tree

[Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 22:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:07:15PM -0800, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
>> >
>
>> That said, it's probably sane to think about a new header to put
>> these tracing prototypes, if it's included by kernel.h,
>> linux/ftrace.h is already filled with non-general purpose things.
>> So may be linux/trace.h ? Yeah this could be confusing, Steve what
>> do you think?
>>
>> And all in one, it would probably better to split this in three
>> patches: one that moves printk helpers out of kernel.h to printk.h,
>> another following the same pattern for panic things and another one
>> for tracing things.
>
> Yeah, I'm fine with moving the tracing related stuff in kernel.h into a
> trace.h file and keep ftrace.h specific to ftrace in general.
>
> But I still find it necessary that trace.h gets included by kernel.h.

Thanks, will do

>
> I can just imaging Thomas yelling at me more when he adds a
> tracing_off() or trace_printk() somewhere and then gets a warning about
> it not being declared.
>
> I also gave that patch a NAK, in case that carries any weight.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>



-- 
Regards
dave