From: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/06] kernel.h hexdump cleanup
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:27:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8e1da1002241927n53287c0xeab50d6d6d623d99@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100224181646.bde9c183.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:52:49 +0800 Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:19 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>> >> hexdump stuff in kernel.h should be put into a standalone head file
>> >
>> > I think it'd be clearer to have logging functions
>> > in kernel.h split into a separate header or grouped
>> > a bit better in kernel.h.
>> >
>> > I would have kernel.h #include that header though
>> > rather than splitting out things like hexdump functions
>> > into a separate file requiring yet another #include in
>> > source files.
>>
>> Andrew, what do you think about this?
>
> Well. Avoiding bisection-bustage is hardly a priority any more, but
> let's not break bisection this time if we can avoid it.
Thanks, see it.
>
>> Actually I hesitate to send this patch as well, too many recipients
>> needed from get_maintainer.pl.
>
> They'll live ;)
>
--
Regards
dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-25 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-22 14:19 Dave Young
2010-02-22 19:25 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-02-25 1:52 ` Dave Young
2010-02-22 19:43 ` Joe Perches
2010-02-25 1:52 ` Dave Young
2010-02-25 2:16 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-25 3:27 ` Dave Young [this message]
2010-02-25 3:39 ` Joe Perches
2010-02-25 4:44 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2010-02-25 7:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8e1da1002241927n53287c0xeab50d6d6d623d99@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome