From: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur2@ibm.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] KVM: selftests: add powerpc support
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:19:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a911b4fa-0127-4e0c-b75f-faa4fcd4bb87@ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1790101179.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
On 22/09/26 11:58 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Patch v4 -> v5:
> ==============
> - Fixed the issues reported by Anushree while running on kvm on powervm
> (nested).
> - Fixed memslot_perf_test on powerpc.
>
> PATCH v3 -> PATCH v4:
> ==================
> - Rebased on top of Sean's new page allocator patch series v2 [1]
> This allowed to drop and patch-2 since it will now come from Sean's
> v2.
> - Addressed review comments from Sean - squashed patches 6-10 in patch-1 of
> this.
> - Dropped patch-5 to print vcpu_id when KVM_CREATE_VCPU ioctl fails.
> - Added additional patch-3 to this series to allow dirty_log_test to run on all
> big-endian machines.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260902164123.2546762-1-seanjc@google.com/
> [v3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/2d2c46be7f051c7f1c645afaec67f57067d37a81.1781093720.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
>
> Testing updates:
> ================
> I have done some fair amount of testing of the selftests both on real HW and
> using various combinations on qemu (powernv+LE (default), pseries+cap-nested-hv,
> pseries+cap-nested-papr, powernv+BE). There were few powerpc kvm kernel fixes
> which were identified as part of this work. I will send those patches separately
> as those anyway needs to go in separately.
>
> <pasted snippet of cover letter from previous versions>
> =======================================================
>
> Hi All,
>
> This series primarly adds KVM selftests support for powerpc (64-bit, BookS,
> radix MMU).
>
> This patch series is originally Nick's work. I have mainly only rebased it on
> the latest upstream tree. Since the rebase required few changes to all the four
> patches (Patch 1-4), I have dropped the earlier Acked-by from Michael Ellerman.
>
> Since the last series was posted three years ago [1], I am resetting the version
> to RFC. This rebase was done as part of a larger effort to improve the selftests
> infrastructure for Linux on PowerPC tree. Thanks to Harsh and Maddy for their
> help on this.
>
>
> Nicholas Piggin (1):
> KVM: PPC: selftests: add support for powerpc
>
> Ritesh Harjani (IBM) (8):
> KVM: selftests: Enable kvm_create_max_vcpus test for powerpc
> KVM: selftests: Don't limit LE dirty-bitmap bitops to s390x
> KVM: selftests: Split out a KVM_CREATE_VCPU helper that can fail
> KVM: selftests: Make kvm_create_max_vcpus tolerate ENOMEM
> KVM: selftests: Limit the number of VM creates in hardware_disable_test
> KVM: PPC: selftests: Make nested case on pseries LPARs as resource constrained
> KVM: PPC: selftests: Skip idle-page check when running nested on pseries LPAR
> KVM: selftests: Move memslot_perf_test off the 256M ELF load address
>
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 10 +
> .../selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c | 11 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c | 12 +-
> .../selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c | 7 +-
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 13 +
> .../selftests/kvm/include/powerpc/hcall.h | 17 +
> .../kvm/include/powerpc/kvm_util_arch.h | 22 +
> .../selftests/kvm/include/powerpc/ppc_asm.h | 32 ++
> .../selftests/kvm/include/powerpc/processor.h | 46 ++
> .../selftests/kvm/include/powerpc/ucall.h | 21 +
> .../selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c | 29 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/guest_modes.c | 20 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 39 +-
> .../selftests/kvm/lib/powerpc/handlers.S | 93 ++++
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/powerpc/hcall.c | 45 ++
> .../selftests/kvm/lib/powerpc/processor.c | 522 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/powerpc/ucall.c | 22 +
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 2 +-
> 20 files changed, 942 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/powerpc/hcall.h
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/powerpc/kvm_util_arch.h
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/powerpc/ppc_asm.h
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/powerpc/processor.h
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/powerpc/ucall.h
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/powerpc/handlers.S
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/powerpc/hcall.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/powerpc/processor.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/powerpc/ucall.c
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
>
Hi Ritesh,
Thanks for working on the fixes, I tested this series (v5) on top of
Sean's pre-enabling series (v2) [1]
on two real PowerPC systems. All patches applied cleanly and the tests
work correctly on both PowerVM LPAR and PowerNV bare-metal.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260902164123.2546762-1-seanjc@google.com/
Full test suite summary (make run_tests):
-----------------------------------------
LPAR bare-metal
demand_paging_test PASS PASS
dirty_log_test PASS PASS
dirty_log_perf_test PASS PASS
guest_print_test PASS PASS
hardware_disable_test PASS PASS
kvm_binary_stats_test PASS PASS
kvm_create_max_vcpus PASS PASS
kvm_page_table_test PASS PASS
set_memory_region_test PASS PASS
memslot_modification_stress_test PASS PASS
memslot_perf_test PASS PASS
access_tracking_perf_test PASS PASS
irqfd_test SKIP SKIP
vm_types_test SKIP SKIP
--------------------------------------------------
Total 12 PASS 12 PASS
2 SKIP 2 SKIP
Per-patch validation:
---------------------
Patch 1 [KVM: PPC: selftests: add support for powerpc]
All 14 tests built and ran successfully on PowerPC — the core
infrastructure (lib/powerpc/processor.c, handlers.S, ucall.c,
hcall.c) works correctly on both systems.
Patch 2 [KVM: selftests: Enable kvm_create_max_vcpus test for powerpc]
kvm_create_max_vcpus ran successfully on both systems.
Patch 3 [KVM: selftests: Don't limit LE dirty-bitmap bitops to s390x]
dirty_log_test ran successfully on both systems for both 4K and
64K page modes (big-endian dirty-bitmap bitops working correctly).
Patch 4 [KVM: selftests: Split out a KVM_CREATE_VCPU helper that can fail]
KVM_CREATE_VCPU helper exercised by kvm_create_max_vcpus on both
systems — clean failure path confirmed on LPAR (ENOMEM at vCPU 72).
Patch 5 [KVM: selftests: Make kvm_create_max_vcpus tolerate ENOMEM]
LPAR: Created 72 vCPUs before ENOMEM at id 72 — test
completed gracefully without crash or assert.
bare-metal: Successfully created all 2048 vCPUs — no ENOMEM hit.
Patch 6 [KVM: selftests: Limit the number of VM creates in
hardware_disable_test]
hardware_disable_test ran successfully on both systems without
hitting OOM — VM create limiting working correctly on LPAR.
Patch 7 [KVM: PPC: selftests: Make nested case on pseries LPARs as
resource constrained]
access_tracking_perf_test correctly identified the LPAR as a
resource-constrained nested environment and adjusted accordingly.
Patch 8 [KVM: PPC: selftests: Skip idle-page check when running nested
on pseries LPAR]
LPAR:
Skipping idle page count sanity check, because the test is run nested
[idle-page check correctly skipped on nested pseries LPAR]
bare-metal:
[No skip message — idle-page sanity check ran in full on PowerNV]
Patch 9 [KVM: selftests: Move memslot_perf_test off the 256M ELF load
address]
memslot_perf_test ran successfully on both systems — ELF load
address conflict with PPC's 256M region resolved correctly.
Notes on SKIPs:
---------------
- irqfd_test: PowerPC has no in-kernel irqchip.
1..0 # SKIP - Requirement not met:
kvm_arch_has_default_irqchip()
Pre-existing, unrelated to this series.
- vm_types_test: KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES is x86-only (SEV-SNP/TDX).
1..0 # SKIP - Requirement not met:
kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES)
Pre-existing, unrelated to this series.
Please feel free to add :
Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you,
Anushree Mathur
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 18:28 Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] KVM: PPC: selftests: add support for powerpc Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: selftests: Enable kvm_create_max_vcpus test " Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] KVM: selftests: Don't limit LE dirty-bitmap bitops to s390x Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] KVM: selftests: Split out a KVM_CREATE_VCPU helper that can fail Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: selftests: Make kvm_create_max_vcpus tolerate ENOMEM Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: selftests: Limit the number of VM creates in hardware_disable_test Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] KVM: PPC: selftests: Make nested case on pseries LPARs as resource constrained Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] KVM: PPC: selftests: Skip idle-page check when running nested on pseries LPAR Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-22 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] KVM: selftests: Move memslot_perf_test off the 256M ELF load address Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2026-09-29 1:35 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] KVM: selftests: add powerpc support Ritesh Harjani
2026-09-29 5:49 ` Anushree Mathur [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a911b4fa-0127-4e0c-b75f-faa4fcd4bb87@ibm.com \
--to=anushree.mathur2@ibm.com \
--cc=anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®