From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com, elver@google.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] selftests/rseq: Add test for rseq+pkeys
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 15:23:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9862b5b-61e5-4455-9b6f-d05050f11b64@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f0cd73072eb321fb5f6993cbcb9b2e67ba6355d.1739790300.git.dvyukov@google.com>
On 2025-02-17 06:07, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Add a test that ensures that PKEY-protected struct rseq works
> and does not lead to process kills.
Rather than depend on the glibc rseq tunable to disable glibc
rseq support, you could simply setup a rseq_cs in a separate
page and get the kernel to hit _that_ page through the
rseq_cs pointer.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/rseq/pkey_test.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile
> index 5a3432fceb586..9111d25fea3af 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ OVERRIDE_TARGETS = 1
>
> TEST_GEN_PROGS = basic_test basic_percpu_ops_test basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test param_test \
> param_test_benchmark param_test_compare_twice param_test_mm_cid \
> - param_test_mm_cid_benchmark param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice
> + param_test_mm_cid_benchmark param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice pkey_test
>
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = librseq.so
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/pkey_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/pkey_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..ba5c1f6e99ab5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/pkey_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1
> +/*
> + * Ensure that rseq works when rseq data is protected with PKEYs.
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <err.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <sys/mman.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + void *rseq;
> + unsigned long page_size;
> + int pkey, i;
> +
> + pkey = pkey_alloc(0, 0);
> + if (pkey == -1) {
> + printf("[SKIP]\tKernel does not support PKEYs: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Prevent glibc from registering own struct rseq.
> + * We need to know the rseq address to protect it, but also we need
> + * it to be placed on own page that does not contain other data
> + * (e.g. errno).
> + */
> + if (!getenv("RSEQ_TEST_REEXECED")) {
> + setenv("RSEQ_TEST_REEXECED", "1", 1);
> + setenv("GLIBC_TUNABLES", "glibc.pthread.rseq=0", 1);
> + if (execvpe(argv[0], argv, environ))
> + err(1, "execvpe failed");
> + }
> +
> + page_size = getpagesize();
> + rseq = mmap(NULL, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_ANON | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
> + if (rseq == MAP_FAILED)
> + err(1, "mmap failed");
> + if (pkey_mprotect(rseq, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, pkey))
> + err(1, "pkey_mprotect failed");
> + if (syscall(__NR_rseq, rseq, 32, 0, 0))
> + err(1, "rseq failed");
> + if (pkey_set(pkey, PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS))
> + err(1, "pkey_set failed");
> +
> + /*
> + * If the kernel misbehaves, context switches in the following loop
> + * will kill the process with SIGSEGV.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> + usleep(100);
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-17 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1739790300.git.dvyukov@google.com>
2025-02-17 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] pkeys: add API to switch to permissive pkey register Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-17 20:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-17 20:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-17 20:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-21 17:01 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-24 13:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-25 16:15 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-25 21:56 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-26 10:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-26 17:21 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-27 13:58 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-21 17:37 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-17 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/signal: Use switch_to_permissive_pkey_reg() helper Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-21 16:26 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-24 13:13 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-17 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] rseq: Make rseq work with protection keys Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-17 20:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-18 7:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-18 14:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-18 15:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-18 15:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-18 15:37 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-21 11:22 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-21 19:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-21 17:17 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-21 19:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-21 19:48 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-21 20:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-21 20:50 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-21 21:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-21 21:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-02-21 21:45 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-24 13:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-21 21:40 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-17 11:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/rseq: Add test for rseq+pkeys Dmitry Vyukov
2025-02-17 20:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2025-02-21 17:24 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-24 13:22 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9862b5b-61e5-4455-9b6f-d05050f11b64@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®