From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14233224FA for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 02:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733278998; cv=none; b=nglCPojj8cUkz1p8Q5h5hH6krbWhZBoFwCRdDLYcjtXMk5HpZjIe+ssRfr126FOtBLnDt9ZORh8zsATk0f5FW3bFL/cXMu6US4YQXTNDyMhwWY1PHyF+4MBITcEr5XzA5ix3HtuD0QAAg5AYWw3CNAzBO/UiRcF0espDpgBdwWE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733278998; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hVPWjxDf3J62Z7wnIqQWbdoImqDsRWqpTgW/qaZa0BY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=BWuz2c86mmaTpLHZTBwo92WQuMGtPj/be0o6ZwUq/1xTot8rND3H6klLfPqOYUtmHbVM+W9+AWnbXAaGMmyfrgy3fOJCQ5/qK2Bc4ENCwF2DiCxe+q/R8I/jnGQuWCJFjuiVtSHq/CEiU2MXNN9czqeuGt5rmxK6s4UCy751B8w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=A0gvFFur; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="A0gvFFur" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1733278994; bh=hVPWjxDf3J62Z7wnIqQWbdoImqDsRWqpTgW/qaZa0BY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=A0gvFFurp2Dn6uAuJi/e5zdcYYEKkJJtQlu4JFEHpWCPvSr5lsqsuH2ju7XfY2iTU K+RA40TbSdIXfFTIBaaR55eHenhPEU9YMBzkWuHoEYSU82f6JQyXHIW/48oku0zhXo BSgPE+MSGBzmokhsalyTQXp/K8C888UWi0J4+D3LFv1hOlMQC3lxZnDYaCd5ZHMmO/ +wganKwSZNmPAkNP7MTX6ttSkPzCNTx8+RKtCUdnIc6NRcdr0Rxd+tBbVBxhdNZmnI V8hJfQ0+4a1zoVZB67UlJ9zsUWBCErDBmWM7UvxyiAcNNmZ2P/f7T5FZ9Tij93Eaxz lnAg1wwCv2PcA== Received: from [192.168.50.250] (unknown [171.76.86.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: vignesh) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 916CC17E0F8A; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 03:23:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 07:53:08 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] drm/ci: uprev mesa and modify gitlab rules To: Helen Mae Koike Fornazier Cc: dri-devel , daniels , airlied , daniel , robdclark , "guilherme.gallo" , "sergi.blanch.torne" , "jani.nikula" , "dmitry.baryshkov" , mripard , linux-kernel References: <20241128042025.611659-1-vignesh.raman@collabora.com> <1938cdd3a4b.10ab98f77527721.7719837795987945098@collabora.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Vignesh Raman In-Reply-To: <1938cdd3a4b.10ab98f77527721.7719837795987945098@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Helen, On 03/12/24 19:42, Helen Mae Koike Fornazier wrote: > Hi Vignesh, > > Thanks for your patchset. > > > > ---- On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 01:20:19 -0300 Vignesh Raman wrote --- > > > Uprev mesa to adapt to the latest changes in mesa-ci, > > including new container jobs and stages. Update the > > lava-submit script to align with recent mesa-ci changes > > for using LAVA rootfs overlays. Modify gitLab rules > > to include scheduled pipelines. > > > > Pipeline link, > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/vigneshraman/linux/-/pipelines/1318024 > > I see this pipeline has a few failures, most of them are because outdated xfails files and timeouts. > Could we fix that first? So when we test this patchset we can verify if it introduces any issues or not. Yes. The expectation files are not updated. I will uprev IGT and rerun the tests and update xfails. Regards, Vignesh > > Thanks > Helen > > > > > Vignesh Raman (2): > > drm/ci: uprev mesa > > drm/ci: update gitlab rules > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/build.sh | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/build.yml | 104 ++++++++++++++++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/container.yml | 22 ++-- > > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/gitlab-ci.yml | 185 ++++++++++++++++-------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/image-tags.yml | 11 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/lava-submit.sh | 99 +++++++++++----- > > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/test.yml | 33 +++--- > > 7 files changed, 314 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.43.0 > > > > >