From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cevt-r4k: Don't call get_c0_compare_int if timer irq is installed
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9ccd0cd-82ee-4e31-9815-f8f3871b30c8@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240813-get_c0_compare_int-v1-1-a0a1b007d736@flygoat.com>
Hi Jiaxun,
+Daniel/Thomas for CLOCKEVENTS
On 13/8/24 11:59, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> This avoids warning:
>
> [ 0.118053] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:283
>
> Caused by get_c0_compare_int on secondary CPU.
>
> We also skipped saving IRQ number to struct clock_event_device *cd as
> it's never used by clockevent core, as per comments it's only meant
> for "non CPU local devices".
>
> Reported-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/6szkkqxpsw26zajwysdrwplpjvhl5abpnmxgu2xuj3dkzjnvsf@4daqrz4mf44k/
> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c
> index 368e8475870f..5f6e9e2ebbdb 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c
> @@ -303,13 +303,6 @@ int r4k_clockevent_init(void)
> if (!c0_compare_int_usable())
> return -ENXIO;
>
> - /*
> - * With vectored interrupts things are getting platform specific.
> - * get_c0_compare_int is a hook to allow a platform to return the
> - * interrupt number of its liking.
> - */
> - irq = get_c0_compare_int();
> -
> cd = &per_cpu(mips_clockevent_device, cpu);
>
> cd->name = "MIPS";
> @@ -320,7 +313,6 @@ int r4k_clockevent_init(void)
> min_delta = calculate_min_delta();
>
> cd->rating = 300;
> - cd->irq = irq;
What should be the unset value is not clear, clock_event_device::irq
is an int, described in <linux/clockchips.h> as:
@irq: IRQ number (only for non CPU local devices)
Most arch clocks set irq > 0 or don't set it.
Core code / drivers check for irq != -1, irq != 0 or irq >= 0:
kernel/time/tick-common.c-295- if (newdev->irq >= 0 &&
!irq_can_set_affinity(newdev->irq))
kernel/time/tick-common.c-296- return false;
drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c-479- if (evt->irq == -1)
drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c-480- return -EIO;
drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c-562- if (!dev->irq)
drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c-563- return -ENXIO;
Using -1 for unset value seems reasonable, but since most don't set
this default value, I guess that's OK to do the same.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> cd->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
> cd->set_next_event = mips_next_event;
> cd->event_handler = mips_event_handler;
> @@ -332,6 +324,13 @@ int r4k_clockevent_init(void)
>
> cp0_timer_irq_installed = 1;
>
> + /*
> + * With vectored interrupts things are getting platform specific.
> + * get_c0_compare_int is a hook to allow a platform to return the
> + * interrupt number of its liking.
> + */
> + irq = get_c0_compare_int();
> +
> if (request_irq(irq, c0_compare_interrupt, flags, "timer",
> c0_compare_interrupt))
> pr_err("Failed to request irq %d (timer)\n", irq);
>
> ---
> base-commit: 9e6869691724b12e1f43655eeedc35fade38120c
> change-id: 20240812-get_c0_compare_int-66935853a308
>
> Best regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 9:59 Jiaxun Yang
2024-08-16 11:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2024-08-19 10:42 ` Serge Semin
2024-08-22 7:58 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9ccd0cd-82ee-4e31-9815-f8f3871b30c8@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®