mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cevt-r4k: Don't call get_c0_compare_int if timer irq is installed
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:40:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9ccd0cd-82ee-4e31-9815-f8f3871b30c8@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240813-get_c0_compare_int-v1-1-a0a1b007d736@flygoat.com>

Hi Jiaxun,

+Daniel/Thomas for CLOCKEVENTS

On 13/8/24 11:59, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> This avoids warning:
> 
> [    0.118053] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:283
> 
> Caused by get_c0_compare_int on secondary CPU.
> 
> We also skipped saving IRQ number to struct clock_event_device *cd as
> it's never used by clockevent core, as per comments it's only meant
> for "non CPU local devices".
> 
> Reported-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/6szkkqxpsw26zajwysdrwplpjvhl5abpnmxgu2xuj3dkzjnvsf@4daqrz4mf44k/
> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
> ---
>   arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c | 15 +++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c
> index 368e8475870f..5f6e9e2ebbdb 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c
> @@ -303,13 +303,6 @@ int r4k_clockevent_init(void)
>   	if (!c0_compare_int_usable())
>   		return -ENXIO;
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * With vectored interrupts things are getting platform specific.
> -	 * get_c0_compare_int is a hook to allow a platform to return the
> -	 * interrupt number of its liking.
> -	 */
> -	irq = get_c0_compare_int();
> -
>   	cd = &per_cpu(mips_clockevent_device, cpu);
>   
>   	cd->name		= "MIPS";
> @@ -320,7 +313,6 @@ int r4k_clockevent_init(void)
>   	min_delta		= calculate_min_delta();
>   
>   	cd->rating		= 300;
> -	cd->irq			= irq;

What should be the unset value is not clear, clock_event_device::irq
is an int, described in <linux/clockchips.h> as:

   @irq:          IRQ number (only for non CPU local devices)

Most arch clocks set irq > 0 or don't set it.

Core code / drivers check for irq != -1, irq != 0 or irq >= 0:

kernel/time/tick-common.c-295-  if (newdev->irq >= 0 && 
!irq_can_set_affinity(newdev->irq))
kernel/time/tick-common.c-296-          return false;
drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c-479-           if (evt->irq == -1)
drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c-480-                   return -EIO;
drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c-562- if (!dev->irq)
drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c-563-         return -ENXIO;

Using -1 for unset value seems reasonable, but since most don't set
this default value, I guess that's OK to do the same.

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

>   	cd->cpumask		= cpumask_of(cpu);
>   	cd->set_next_event	= mips_next_event;
>   	cd->event_handler	= mips_event_handler;
> @@ -332,6 +324,13 @@ int r4k_clockevent_init(void)
>   
>   	cp0_timer_irq_installed = 1;
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * With vectored interrupts things are getting platform specific.
> +	 * get_c0_compare_int is a hook to allow a platform to return the
> +	 * interrupt number of its liking.
> +	 */
> +	irq = get_c0_compare_int();
> +
>   	if (request_irq(irq, c0_compare_interrupt, flags, "timer",
>   			c0_compare_interrupt))
>   		pr_err("Failed to request irq %d (timer)\n", irq);
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 9e6869691724b12e1f43655eeedc35fade38120c
> change-id: 20240812-get_c0_compare_int-66935853a308
> 
> Best regards,


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-16 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-13  9:59 Jiaxun Yang
2024-08-16 11:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2024-08-19 10:42 ` Serge Semin
2024-08-22  7:58 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a9ccd0cd-82ee-4e31-9815-f8f3871b30c8@linaro.org \
    --to=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®