From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1764054AbXGQLdv@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1764054AbXGQLdv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:33:51 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753224AbXGQLdo
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:33:44 -0400
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.232]:21747 "EHLO
	nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752495AbXGQLdn (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:33:43 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=sw9WCkYflta/nuVHnckAAqM6im+N0biHNQRsRQsxneJF5E1fVYcvy308cfhuYRi2YQ2PUp36QdM8PrhKjTv28URu1dsxu4S7bYJ+N1VmYuVDLLrkZXVAa2liQoHqn6drTPYzwJ/nj4ikKQVo0tnhJiH8TqCAX6xUNT6CDurJCfo=
Message-ID: <a9e22dff0707170433r5c5ee72avacdf7d12994bf8ad@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:33:41 +0300
From: "Ni@m" <niam.niam@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi!
I'm not happy with 2.6.22 stability so I want to stay on 2.6.20.

Does -ck1 patches for 2.6.22 and 2.6.20 make the same job? Or it's
better to backport -ck1 for 2.6.22 to 2.6.20?

Thanks for your time!

Best regards,
Dmitry Milinevsky.