mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org
Cc: orsonzhai@gmail.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	baolin.wang7@gmail.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] mmc: host: sdhci: Add a variable to defer to complete data requests if needed
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 12:09:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9f42792-3432-48f2-c5c4-8b03c32995dd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19910a2f34b9be81f64637a5a5fc8d07bd5f4885.1572326519.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org>

On 29/10/19 7:43 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> When using the host software queue, it will trigger the next request in
> irq handler without a context switch. But the sdhci_request() can not be
> called in interrupt context when using host software queue for some host
> drivers, due to the get_cd() ops can be sleepable.
> 
> But for some host drivers, such as Spreadtrum host driver, the card is
> nonremovable, so the get_cd() ops is not sleepable, which means we can
> complete the data request and trigger the next request in irq handler
> to remove the context switch for the Spreadtrum host driver.
> 
> Thus we still need introduce a variable in struct sdhci_host to indicate
> that we will always to defer to complete data requests if the sdhci_request()
> can not be called in interrupt context for some host drivers, when using
> the host software queue.
> 
> Suggested-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 850241f..9cf2130 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -3035,7 +3035,7 @@ static inline bool sdhci_defer_done(struct sdhci_host *host,
>  {
>  	struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;
>  
> -	return host->pending_reset ||
> +	return host->pending_reset || (host->always_defer_done && data) ||

I didn't realize you still wanted to call the request function in interrupt
context.  In my view that needs a new host API
i.e. int (*request_atomic)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)

>  	       ((host->flags & SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA) && data &&
>  		data->host_cookie == COOKIE_MAPPED);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> index d89cdb9..38fbd18 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> @@ -533,6 +533,7 @@ struct sdhci_host {
>  	bool pending_reset;	/* Cmd/data reset is pending */
>  	bool irq_wake_enabled;	/* IRQ wakeup is enabled */
>  	bool v4_mode;		/* Host Version 4 Enable */
> +	bool always_defer_done;	/* Always defer to complete data requests */
>  
>  	struct mmc_request *mrqs_done[SDHCI_MAX_MRQS];	/* Requests done */
>  	struct mmc_command *cmd;	/* Current command */
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-29  5:43 [PATCH v5 0/4] Add MMC software queue support Baolin Wang
2019-10-29  5:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] mmc: Add MMC host " Baolin Wang
2019-10-29  5:43 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] mmc: host: sdhci: Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops Baolin Wang
2019-10-29  5:43 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] mmc: host: sdhci-sprd: Add software queue support Baolin Wang
2019-10-29  5:43 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] mmc: host: sdhci: Add a variable to defer to complete data requests if needed Baolin Wang
2019-11-06 10:09   ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2019-11-06 10:48     ` Baolin Wang
2019-11-06 12:01       ` Adrian Hunter
2019-11-06 12:17         ` Baolin Wang
2019-11-08 11:08           ` Baolin Wang
2019-11-08 11:23             ` Adrian Hunter
2019-11-08 11:27               ` Baolin Wang
2019-11-06  9:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] Add MMC software queue support Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a9f42792-3432-48f2-c5c4-8b03c32995dd@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®