From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996781B6CE5; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744909215; cv=none; b=Ul7LQiyZvmEnIGWpb5se5mtl2pVmSnQTvvfizIbes7SHhOToJMqSt4YvaQNVHJGvAmzqu28ibCyhnXWAqsji/94T47TGdNudhbD5ivQcu2sNfDP4Zhd1j/Ud1ioWoNA2t46Uqsitn3KZr2lxNNte2PL5rn5/cFaucG7e7tFF6o4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744909215; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nQCnnuQaayG0AUlt7J4i+7082mcRShYU1zxRcAsQQAE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BCvlHcBRtmmwQCcMV4+gwvlUNOQ/V2yOzMGWNy0sn0QArfQM+Ay47ETMs707oaRB1GtiN8EPaSPyv8uBcuFZBO9o+bbYDaVz6NDXo12OQcSntLDuMMdhHlEhovEqruer7g//5/rUOKpYCuIdLG8F7xm4NQWUUpAbx4iB3M7HpxY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: P5ynM797SXukon4iB6i7Wg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OnsjJa3cRs2EI4tz4nhIUA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11406"; a="57896176" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,219,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="57896176" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2025 10:00:13 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rWy/F7c+SyeYPFOo11Ev+g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yfwn/Rs9TluKqRcHV1gQ3Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,219,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="131411561" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Apr 2025 10:00:09 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u5Sar-0000000DGBj-3VcS; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:00:05 +0300 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:00:05 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: David Lechner Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , Cosmin Tanislav , Tomasz Duszynski , Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol , Andreas Klinger , Petre Rodan , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: align buffer for timestamp Message-ID: References: <20250417-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-v1-0-eafac1e22318@baylibre.com> <20250417-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-v1-7-eafac1e22318@baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250417-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-v1-7-eafac1e22318@baylibre.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:52:39AM -0500, David Lechner wrote: > Align the buffer used with iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp() to > ensure the s64 timestamp is aligned to 8 bytes. Same question as per previous patch. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko