From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Fix missing rq lock in scx_bpf_cpuperf_set()
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:04:58 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAaW2qQDg4KXUWwl@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32e5c7cb-5b41-4e02-81d4-5bbed981ab03@igalia.com>
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 04:44:02PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
> Considering almost all chext_ext ops hold an rq lock, the actual ops
> where scx_bpf_cpuperf_set() for a remote CPU is possible will be very
> limited. When there are more use cases for remote CPU kfuncs calls, I
> think we need to come up with some mechanism, for example, extending
> schedule_deferred() to cover more actions.
Oh yeah, the deferring mechanism was designed to host things like this. It
shouldn't be too difficult to expand to cover it.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-21 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-20 19:30 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched_ext: Introduce rq lock tracking Andrea Righi
2025-04-20 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Track currently locked rq Andrea Righi
2025-04-21 19:03 ` Tejun Heo
2025-04-22 6:27 ` Andrea Righi
2025-04-20 19:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Fix missing rq lock in scx_bpf_cpuperf_set() Andrea Righi
2025-04-21 7:44 ` Changwoo Min
2025-04-21 8:35 ` Andrea Righi
2025-04-21 19:04 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-22 8:26 [PATCH v3 0/2] sched_ext: Introduce rq lock tracking Andrea Righi
2025-04-22 8:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Fix missing rq lock in scx_bpf_cpuperf_set() Andrea Righi
2025-04-19 12:24 [PATCH 0/2] sched_ext: Introduce rq lock tracking Andrea Righi
2025-04-19 12:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Fix missing rq lock in scx_bpf_cpuperf_set() Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAaW2qQDg4KXUWwl@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®