mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
	Jake Hillion <jake@hillion.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Clarify CPU context for running/stopping callbacks
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:04:58 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAk52qs21rCXpZlF@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423190059.270236-1-arighi@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 09:00:59PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> The ops.running() and ops.stopping() callbacks can be invoked from a CPU
> other than the one the task is assigned to, particularly during affinity
> changes, as both scx_next_task_scx() and dequeue_task_scx() may run on
> CPUs different from the task's target CPU.
> 
> This behavior can lead to confusion or incorrect assumptions if not
> properly clarified, potentially resulting in bugs (see [1]).
> 
> Therefore, update the documentation to clarify this aspect and advise
> users to use scx_bpf_task_cpu() to determine the actual CPU the task
> will run on or was running on.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/pull/1728
> 
> Cc: Jake Hillion <jake@hillion.co.uk>
> Cc: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/ext.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index a2380a6bba210..f146e678cc261 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -373,6 +373,10 @@ struct sched_ext_ops {
>  	 * @running: A task is starting to run on its associated CPU
>  	 * @p: task starting to run
>  	 *
> +	 * Note that this callback may be called from a CPU other than the
> +	 * one the task is going to run on. Use scx_bpf_task_cpu(@p) to
> +	 * determine the target CPU the task is going to use.

Can you briefly explain the scenario as a part of the comment? Just a couple
sentences can go a long way against future head scratches.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-23 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-23 19:00 Andrea Righi
2025-04-23 19:04 ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAk52qs21rCXpZlF@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=jake@hillion.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®