From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: selftest: improve test string formatting and checksum handling
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 06:07:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAm5Ggfn126EBFae@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423184400.31425ecd@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 06:44:00PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 14:38:58 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > This patchset addresses two issues in the current net selftest
> > framework:
> >
> > - Truncated test names: Existing test names are prefixed with an index,
> > reducing the available space within the ETH_GSTRING_LEN limit. This
> > patch removes the index to allow more descriptive names.
> >
> > - Inconsistent checksum behavior: On DSA setups and similar
> > environments, checksum offloading is not always available or
> > appropriate. The previous selftests did not distinguish between software
> > and hardware checksum modes, leading to unreliable results. This
> > patchset introduces explicit csum_mode handling and adds separate tests
> > for both software and hardware checksum validation.
>
> Doesn't apply, presumably because of the fix that's sitting in net?
Yes, your right. I tried to decouple it, but seems in the last version
made to many changes. Sorry
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 12:38 Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-22 12:38 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: selftests: drop test index from net_selftest_get_strings() Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-22 12:39 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: selftests: prepare for detailed error handling in net_test_get_skb() Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-22 12:39 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: selftests: add checksum mode support and SW checksum handling Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-22 12:39 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: selftests: add PHY loopback tests with HW checksum offload Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-24 1:44 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: selftest: improve test string formatting and checksum handling Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-24 4:07 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2025-04-28 7:56 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-04-28 18:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAm5Ggfn126EBFae@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®