From: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
To: zhengyan <zhengyan@asrmicro.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arve@android.com, tkjos@android.com,
maco@android.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, brauner@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binder: skip dead binder_proc during binder_open
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 14:30:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBDieyvgjcNc61gy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429075030.305-1-zhengyan@asrmicro.com>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 07:50:30AM +0000, zhengyan wrote:
> During binder_open, the binder_proc list is travesed to check
> for the existing binder_proc instances. binder_proc objects
> are async released in a deferred work after binder_release,
> and may remain temporarily on the binder_procs list even after
> being marked as dead.
>
> Without checking the flag, binder_open may face a crash as
> "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
> dead000000000140"
>
> Signed-off-by: zhengyan <zhengyan@asrmicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/android/binder.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
> index 76052006bd87..43ab4350e589 100644
> --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> @@ -6041,6 +6041,8 @@ static int binder_open(struct inode *nodp, struct file *filp)
>
> mutex_lock(&binder_procs_lock);
> hlist_for_each_entry(itr, &binder_procs, proc_node) {
> + if (itr->is_dead)
> + continue;
> if (itr->pid == proc->pid) {
> existing_pid = true;
> break;
> --
> 2.25.1
Can you please explain this scenario? My understanding is that dead
procs are removed from the binder_procs list (with appropriate locks)
before they are marked as ->is_dead. So how is this even possible?
--
Carlos Llamas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 7:50 zhengyan
2025-04-29 10:43 ` Greg KH
2025-04-29 14:30 ` Carlos Llamas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBDieyvgjcNc61gy@google.com \
--to=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=zhengyan@asrmicro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®