From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Falcon, Thomas" <thomas.falcon@intel.com>
Cc: "irogers@google.com" <irogers@google.com>,
"alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"kan.liang@linux.intel.com" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf top: populate PMU capabilities data in perf_env
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 13:56:10 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBo_KvXDmsequWng@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4aa48d010cdaa91355f9f77b1c3a1eefc4b1becb.camel@intel.com>
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 04:09:37PM +0000, Falcon, Thomas wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 20:46 +0000, Falcon, Thomas wrote:
> > On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 13:00 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:42 AM Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > Calling perf top with brach filters enabled on Intel hybrid CPU's
> > > > with branch counter event logging support results in a segfault.
> > > > $ ./perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,\
> > > > frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counter
> > > > perf: Segmentation fault
> > > > -------- backtrace --------
> > > > ./perf() [0x55f460]
> > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1a050) [0x7fd8be227050]
> > > > ./perf() [0x57b4a7]
> > > > ./perf() [0x561e5a]
> > > > ./perf() [0x604a81]
> > > > ./perf() [0x4395b5]
> > > > ./perf() [0x601732]
> > > > ./perf() [0x439bc1]
> > > > ./perf() [0x5d35b3]
> > > > ./perf() [0x43936c]
> > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x70ba8) [0x7fd8be27dba8]
> > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0xf4b8c) [0x7fd8be301b8c]
> > Hi Ian, thanks for reviewing.
> > > Thanks Thomas. Could you generate this backtrace in GDB? I did write a
> > > patch to symbolize backtraces like this:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250313052952.871958-2-irogers@google.com/
> > > Sadly without any reviewed tags and unmerged - the code calls routines
> > > that malloc so it isn't strictly sound if say the backtrace was needed
> > > from a SEGV in the malloc implementation, it is nicely
> > > self-referencing the perf APIs, ..
> > Sorry about that, here is the backtrace I'm seeing when running the perf top command in gdb:
> > Thread 27 "perf" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > [Switching to Thread 0x7fffcb7fe6c0 (LWP 812169)]
> > 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info ()
> > (gdb) backtrace
> > #0 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info ()
> > #1 0x0000000000561e5a in addr_map_symbol.account_cycles ()
> > #2 0x0000000000604a81 in hist.account_cycles ()
> > #3 0x00000000004395b5 in hist_iter.top_callback ()
> > #4 0x0000000000601732 in hist_entry_iter.add ()
> > #5 0x0000000000439bc1 in deliver_event ()
> > #6 0x00000000005d35b3 in __ordered_events__flush ()
> > #7 0x000000000043936c in process_thread ()
> > #8 0x00007ffff6e7dba8 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448
> > #9 0x00007ffff6f01b8c in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78
> Sorry, let me try this again...
> Thread 27 "perf" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7fffcf7fe6c0 (LWP 940046)]
> perf_env__find_br_cntr_info (env=0xf328c0 <perf_env>, nr=0x0, width=0x7fffcf7fd2c0) at util/env.c:653
> 653 *width = env->cpu_pmu_caps ? env->br_cntr_width :
> (gdb) bt
> #0 perf_env__find_br_cntr_info (env=0xf328c0 <perf_env>, nr=0x0, width=0x7fffcf7fd2c0) at util/env.c:653
> #1 0x00000000005ad829 in symbol__account_br_cntr (branch=0x7fffd11f9c00, evsel=0xfae480, offset=20, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:345
> #2 0x00000000005ada8b in symbol__account_cycles (addr=5580436, start=5580433, sym=0x7fffd00d3010, cycles=1, evsel=0xfae480, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:389
> #3 0x00000000005adc06 in addr_map_symbol__account_cycles (ams=0x7fffd17b1e20, start=0x7fffd17b1f00, cycles=1, evsel=0xfae480, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:422
> #4 0x0000000000688ab4 in hist__account_cycles (bs=0x10cbaa8, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, sample=0x7fffcf7fd760, nonany_branch_mode=false, total_cycles=0x0, evsel=0xfae480) at util/hist.c:2774
> #5 0x0000000000446004 in hist_iter__top_callback (iter=0x7fffcf7fd590, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, single=true, arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at builtin-top.c:737
> #6 0x0000000000684d2a in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=0x7fffcf7fd590, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, max_stack_depth=127, arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at util/hist.c:1291
> #7 0x00000000004464fe in perf_event__process_sample (tool=0x7fffffff9de0, event=0x10cba70, evsel=0xfae480, sample=0x7fffcf7fd760, machine=0x105ec68) at builtin-top.c:845
> #8 0x0000000000447523 in deliver_event (qe=0x7fffffffa0f8, qevent=0x10cdd60) at builtin-top.c:1211
> #9 0x0000000000648aff in do_flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, show_progress=false) at util/ordered-events.c:245
> #10 0x0000000000648e56 in __ordered_events__flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=0) at util/ordered-events.c:324
> #11 0x0000000000648f40 in ordered_events__flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, how=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:342
> #12 0x0000000000447097 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at builtin-top.c:1120
> #13 0x00007ffff6e7dba8 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448
> #14 0x00007ffff6f01b8c in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78
I'll test on a 14700 later today, but on this one it is working:
root@x1:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo
model name : 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1365U
root@x1:~# perf -vv
perf version 6.15.rc2.g8feafba59c51
aio: [ on ] # HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT
bpf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
bpf_skeletons: [ on ] # HAVE_BPF_SKEL
debuginfod: [ on ] # HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT
dwarf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT
dwarf_getlocations: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT
dwarf-unwind: [ on ] # HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
auxtrace: [ on ] # HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
libbfd: [ OFF ] # HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT ( tip: Deprecated, license incompatibility, use BUILD_NONDISTRO=1 and install binutils-dev[el] )
libcapstone: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBCAPSTONE_SUPPORT
libcrypto: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT
libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT
libelf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT
libnuma: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
libopencsd: [ on ] # HAVE_CSTRACE_SUPPORT
libperl: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT
libpfm4: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPFM
libpython: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT
libslang: [ on ] # HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT
libtraceevent: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT
libunwind: [ OFF ] # HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT ( tip: Deprecated, use LIBUNWIND=1 and install libunwind-dev[el] to build with it )
lzma: [ on ] # HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT
numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT
zlib: [ on ] # HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT
zstd: [ on ] # HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT
root@x1:~# perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counte
With what is in perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next:
⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -10
8feafba59c510be3 (HEAD -> perf-tools-next, x1/perf-tools-next, x1/HEAD) perf test: Add direct off-cpu tests
9557c000768741bb perf record --off-cpu: Add --off-cpu-thresh option
74069a01609ef0f4 perf record --off-cpu: Dump the remaining PERF_SAMPLE_ in sample_type from BPF's stack trace map
8ae7a5769b0a3ac2 perf script: Display off-cpu samples correctly
7de1a87f1ee75743 perf record --off-cpu: Disable perf_event's callchain collection
7f8f56475d585117 perf evsel: Assemble off-cpu samples
d6948f2af24e04ea perf record --off-cpu: Dump off-cpu samples in BPF
282c195906c76ddf perf record --off-cpu: Preparation of off-cpu BPF program
0f72027bb9fb77a2 perf record --off-cpu: Parse off-cpu event
671e943452b18001 perf evsel: Expose evsel__is_offcpu_event() for future use
⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-01 18:41 Thomas Falcon
2025-05-01 20:00 ` Ian Rogers
2025-05-01 20:46 ` Falcon, Thomas
2025-05-06 16:09 ` Falcon, Thomas
2025-05-06 16:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2025-05-06 18:52 ` Falcon, Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBo_KvXDmsequWng@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®