From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B04C22173C; Wed, 21 May 2025 19:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747855130; cv=none; b=tDrUpCbfRw0yLd4+2gNa7JrQFUqyNhS4kFMi6kwkOil8JgwF3TL8okzmGcGwNTKnIK1hZR/QvVgypuzVDcbubKxM3NAdhwZeGr4ZMiI75Y82RTuCMUZ4rVqYq2NIXca2X07GeP6qgZsK2+1KjpipRff/tlg/exjhd/y42xdGW4Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747855130; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nga7nxK8EKA/8Sj8LjZxZFXgqcvpaPVSZXuNqx5KJE8=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gSCjHUb+5Xf2QRA7DZ1I85qnT8LXdv3vtvBH7RRPBa+Ka5ut/LsI4Q710DR0dOF3abmPwq7pup/zqY+GgN8TAzel1DRvjnVFgu9eROD5V64FYwjYngt8kmqWCcplpsLPAWSP5al/S2m1hTmGhdEfWQOboISAKgyUaS1Ep0KxMRY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b=h37EErwx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="h37EErwx" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279868.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 54LI8AwO011657; Wed, 21 May 2025 19:18:44 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh=4Iu1V/M0M1Lmpks9xJhPotBm jvTzR7X1AB4T0P1QS+E=; b=h37EErwxoYLH9yBiAruxXL7lhO+tCIf7W3XUtepb 9FaiL6/IM7s1AcL7T+7tjljTufGr9jr/EMUNK7PW1Ip1XI1h1oYAJJvIEpVTgF8C i17GODF9noTb1n7cYk2DXIXDIGxNln/dbzJs9KTL9XgLfl+h6M5FBmUHqA/+L4gR 0R9D6QbAxOWK86SFUOiW809aZUUW0LbVQR58BPy/lk8AWOFX07uci32NPmFthnVo gJvmXKhVcdLO15DiW3iG9d5ePUSYqhM5GffDwTNW/9kzs3WSmnmD1SloC3mYo8HL A6/plzlfYxFU1j2udI7p0KdfLX8/TorMACUTQIIRfE1SdQ== Received: from nalasppmta03.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 46rwfb3y81-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 May 2025 19:18:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.209.197]) by NALASPPMTA03.qualcomm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 54LJIgQk031649 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 May 2025 19:18:42 GMT Received: from hu-wasimn-hyd.qualcomm.com (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.9; Wed, 21 May 2025 12:18:36 -0700 Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 00:48:23 +0530 From: Wasim Nazir To: Krzysztof Kozlowski CC: Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add bindings for QCS9075 SOC based board Message-ID: References: <20250521140807.3837019-1-quic_wasimn@quicinc.com> <20250521140807.3837019-2-quic_wasimn@quicinc.com> <79eb2b17-06ee-42d4-9954-a78ada1ced29@kernel.org> <9df2f9f3-289f-4916-a293-ad5d97d530fe@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9df2f9f3-289f-4916-a293-ad5d97d530fe@kernel.org> X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.197) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: BbFfJDQOK9hHxcjsyODhItIrXNGGVpjL X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwNTIxMDE5MSBTYWx0ZWRfXwwoOAKAuLxy6 /wqX1FHVtcX/KNQc5LCXwqo8UZAWrfP0Qey25joZzXbEORty1Xst26247ctSCjGajaN0yjpirsb GMGvh4svM/p6yBxRNLjOrnviFBbDpE6739uUl1VppcCkbI1Wo5jN9+yLbdTOT73tH8cljGZtWWW XL/SjRqaT5zbEemp3fLQGpP3m47vK45LY7P2I3iHwMnAcPokkOzMatx76lcBLlJY1aGtKs/Qo4Y cbhJubf3zLPRgLfxMZy+Kms1788KUS5ctr0TpX2PVXZSotPfMcdlwLoMWNidEyujwKsEtj3HXZZ F83aADODH5N6+M1eTklpYtvEBx7RK2HZpWaxaHDW4m/P0/zrDoBleuaNJbQpYo0xzjcXchw3IX2 VbreqHOAPUW6hrCaAkwDyBFHfRVqeTZJyiYIv2AXeC8lBOKjtpajOTcok5LBDviGd0CG1hxy X-Proofpoint-GUID: BbFfJDQOK9hHxcjsyODhItIrXNGGVpjL X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=dLCmmPZb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=682e2714 cx=c_pps a=ouPCqIW2jiPt+lZRy3xVPw==:117 a=ouPCqIW2jiPt+lZRy3xVPw==:17 a=GEpy-HfZoHoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=dt9VzEwgFbYA:10 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=EUspDBNiAAAA:8 a=COk6AnOGAAAA:8 a=07lBpJVSqj2dUEkWpfEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=TjNXssC_j7lpFel5tvFf:22 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.0.736,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-05-21_06,2025-05-20_03,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=984 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam authscore=0 authtc=n/a authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2505160000 definitions=main-2505210191 On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 06:26:40PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 21/05/2025 17:35, Wasim Nazir wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 04:20:53PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 21/05/2025 16:08, Wasim Nazir wrote: > >>> QCS9075 is compatible Industrial-IOT grade variant of SA8775p SOC. > >>> Unlike QCS9100, it doesn't have safety monitoring feature of > >>> Safety-Island(SAIL) subsystem, which affects thermal management. > >>> > >>> qcs9075-iq-9075-evk board is based on QCS9075 SOC. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Wasim Nazir > >>> --- > >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 7 +++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > >>> > >> > >> This was already acked twice by two DT maintainers. Apparently we need > >> the third one. > > > > The previous acknowledgment has been removed due to changes in the code. > > Since, here I have removed the som compatible so though of getting it > > reviewed again. Som compatible is removed to make it align with other > > sa8775p & its derivative targets which we are trying to refactor along with > > Ride changes in other series. > > Nothing was explained in cover letter and dropping tags needs explicit > mentioning. Nothing explained about first tag being dropped, either! > Read really carefully submitting patches and your internal guideline > before sending patches. I'm sorry about that; it wasn't intentional. I'll make sure to take care of it next time. I do try to mention changes in the changelog, but I understand now that it's not sufficient. > > But that was not about it. It was about us spending 1 or 5 minutes on > your patch every time, because you send something not ready which your > company decides to change thus we need to spend time again, and then you > change it again, which we need to spend time again... do you get the point? > I have made the code changes to align with our discussion in the other series [1] of changes for Ride. Let me know if we need further discussion on this to conclude on DT structure for sa8775p & IQ9 targets. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aCdAuTS4pg7arxwC@hu-wasimn-hyd.qualcomm.com/ > That is not fair. Your marketing changes should not cause more effort on > us. And this is not the first time. I truly appreciate all your efforts. I understand there have been mistakes on our end, but we are learning a lot from this process. We are noting valuable points to make our internal processes more efficient and reduce multiple iterations. > > At least I do not agree on that. Anyway, I explained my point of view to > Bjorn and Konrad. I am not going to review this. Maybe you will be lucky > with the third DT maintainer. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Regards, Wasim