From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f201.google.com (mail-pg1-f201.google.com [209.85.215.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C120E2BF96F for ; Tue, 13 May 2025 17:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747158852; cv=none; b=WHkX1IJa4B5gK7LcMn8to+T/F77GSXzSWaNIjk3FeL6y+YZutm/Ezn7xrH9odf8AktdVciWdgj+5uRpnovOJaY3moudH4b3U/AgRd7XcREzS9IXQVsPa8lSTc8At5Yc/b7FbZvm2sDqW2VCxcmlIaH081oyd/luxn0HLD9ItYIM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747158852; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZETV0SyLB51ABOS7GCLSTe/c/Lkm4H/VBnpprfCzoQw=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=BsSdCE1gPLEthbqOZGOLe2vciERDk9+p6SpuS2RwU9E/zWKAMNTxYpAv4MOr9tKI0HaPB41HHom2rUvRd639F1eoCWRlaPfwrOkViRi6x4HPQoVCW9rtwSlIikDyvIhSu09lrdhP+uWDDLmWTgKTZFK/cnhOpBEdWbNs/ulIODo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=acH8k/2y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="acH8k/2y" Received: by mail-pg1-f201.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b20027d9ac0so3382506a12.1 for ; Tue, 13 May 2025 10:54:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1747158849; x=1747763649; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=F1ScAKPK9lKlY9UgspugLQpSKdL/YPUt4UHrgfW8UlU=; b=acH8k/2yIcyjz1Sa059qHVw9qnQFUxllHvkDqapLBEOE3oo7FcVxe2nZrPWWf1XsrX zS3BlX0T5FFqqT00iktnn8cHB/BExnlbl7HKTk2k25gRxZvoihIL6gzWC6jomF2Qi4OQ WpHVlAU93merFMOXUxCasis/OjdGNInTmc9p8iyyNchBxEwPlu6A1KfJrTJqVe+yz2vR ztBIvHAiKq8UuAVJEEdOU6h90H1cevVv0u1/UIE3/qt7MM25RQRBaYWWZdthQE5ozGNH sxo8J6jVMgre9UhdKjUI/v5b6kMkSl96XtvbLHsKMmSQ2JTV4OHg6mHXgARFhFeAS9VS beUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747158849; x=1747763649; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=F1ScAKPK9lKlY9UgspugLQpSKdL/YPUt4UHrgfW8UlU=; b=WovzDUdvgCRGv6rDxL+VdDqDeZevvHtJvQ3b8CISfRqTlDkdmDFJsLq58WyTtrfZoM R1Ns7TxnhqZxnr4hnBDjvCAy5NuxgRyv9uTLfDm0Fqan3AiBXA/oSbDccAMY3CCsF60A G+anK0jJUw7Bp8s1XXjAVqHgLxfEziVpldQreKdmoL4KAi+LtfUrkLTFosCD/ARbT7Rh 2qpwnMuRUTFDTcYBD1TlPU71E4DKFk4LDfy8y3rknHHoue4k8uJx8C09/h9q9Vqofncb GR68Ep1C2liU2k73Cf8EBBrOGnHfX21R1kmAuHODwKO3Cyz5DRRfp0CvCnfdEZt+dXbK s61g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV74Vf8/mBVTFrXEG3SR6l0JdGED5O/q5jCDQrdhuAAlvpa4HpEypn6MdhjEdF1Pd0GvnssQL1e5eHyYEw=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwWG/8f3TQlGOnfh1YgQs8yDGLkUsN8YM20SyrdrGOqYnbF7UZt tlFkAHnb4SopdWyYSvktfmiww+BbzJkalFuuVaKRG5+jHOEM6hLOfOZNE8lBe8Q62p0L5g7OUeY 1AA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHiDZAiOpBEFOJgxUpXok2oMelxQphuEuzlOnuu5yK+a04Vf0oTH+lvsg7fpahPLTxAOdtcgKu4Bpw= X-Received: from pjk3.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:90b:5583:b0:2fa:1481:81f5]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:90b:268b:b0:2fe:a336:fe63 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-30e2e62a8f7mr733965a91.24.1747158848982; Tue, 13 May 2025 10:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 10:54:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: <9F6D5641-E2DC-47EF-BAFC-E0FF20D1FC08@nutanix.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250313203702.575156-1-jon@nutanix.com> <20250313203702.575156-16-jon@nutanix.com> <9F6D5641-E2DC-47EF-BAFC-E0FF20D1FC08@nutanix.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_spte to understand MBEC From: Sean Christopherson To: Jon Kohler Cc: "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" , "x86@kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sergey Dyasli Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 13, 2025, Jon Kohler wrote: > > I would straight up WARN, because it should be impossible to reach this= code with > > ACC_USER_EXEC_MASK set. In fact, this entire blob of code should be #i= fdef'd > > out for PTTYPE_EPT. AFAICT, the only reason it doesn't break nEPT is b= ecause > > its impossible to have a WRITE EPT violation without READ (a.k.a. USER)= being > > set. >=20 > Would you like me to send a separate patch out for that to clean up as > I go? Or make such ifdef=E2=80=99ery as part of this series? I'll send a patch. It's not at all urgent, not a hard dependency for MBEC,= the comment(s) needs to be rewritten, I want to do an audit of paging_tmpl.h to= see if there is more code that'd be worth #idef'ing out for nEPT.