From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB101E990B; Thu, 15 May 2025 09:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747301624; cv=none; b=sS1aJ5gzDXShTw2WvyGAsTanB66uqZpWdLdEBZgGJIYpXtumgJ12HbHZJUf7N6A0yYE746rSKYI00a3fWHEI14UC08rfehMqrjWW7iz0dnEZ1rBV1ivr35PkPathw8HuucE7eB2T68VlClHn8BfB6K+NVfG7shMvGLYgVF62eH0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747301624; c=relaxed/simple; bh=U+tPnOpL3m607kNEaHvTgUEJzEiFqUT9VJpj4Anya/k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Xrq0Kb1EwKMjeHukNhq2U811Wbxs8FkIupC+CYYgEykHvUDio4PDbkeAmlsVBJsfBXgdEfltpNpiJ+tEQyKTYIkikICQXIo1ZvCprxu00QuJbqERpnr7lW8lOyUxPSwysMqnDaexzYq0gSRDb53vU1XRjp01PbxIsCFks7CXZ+E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UXNjgnWA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UXNjgnWA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0F04C4CEE7; Thu, 15 May 2025 09:33:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747301623; bh=U+tPnOpL3m607kNEaHvTgUEJzEiFqUT9VJpj4Anya/k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UXNjgnWA+H9nCoRF2qGohiFrM+9FMPSMyzLbuKMGzSIut6SneQ5AYUcvMaR4mY8zs 5rZ2AQ0wyVGpNGFJXsr1fU4zR+9Uzk66i7NnFVaQlkhcQaXpo67AMgy/qYLD628N0f faFIQ9MSqNnmIyNl2evCqzqXt9Cx69CBb+nnunbzBgUGY2wu4gDEYlKPFCElm+ZzUF oI0ZEebDwChS2GbD3vAcnmmT5D/eugikStnnPtMeePAKnCR5P+RTAK6fWefc5ukQ28 r/ilLS4EEcMC6h9BU9inlZuFI2WrvRWCrPtFi1hDuFnefN8qxXICkIoQUMdd4YRTaZ pExzq0Nm0S3/g== Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 11:33:39 +0200 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: Artur Weber , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Liam Girdwood , Florian Fainelli , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Stanislav Jakubek , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for multiple device types + BCM59054 compatible Message-ID: References: <20250430-bcm59054-v8-0-e4cf638169a4@gmail.com> <20250430-bcm59054-v8-4-e4cf638169a4@gmail.com> <20250509140957.GD2492385@google.com> <20250515071357.GD2936510@google.com> <20250515092000.GF2936510@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ejBQO6RFNOdfKSiv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250515092000.GF2936510@google.com> X-Cookie: Well begun is half done. --ejBQO6RFNOdfKSiv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:20:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2025, Mark Brown wrote: > > Well, you choose 3 - I do think it'd be a lot easier to go with option > > 2, or with applying the rest to your tree as acks come in. There seemed > > to still be a reasonable amount of discussion on the MFD bits (eg, > > there's some formatting comments still) so I was expecting this series > > to churn some more and was waiting for a resend. > Yes, I expected to apply v9 with your Ack. OK, that's about where I was expecting - at least one more respin before the MFD bits are stable. > I can go with 2 in this case. Applying in dribs-and-drabs as Acks come > in would be sub-optimal and would likely end up in a mess. Well, then just going a head and applying them on a branch with a tag seems easier than delaying then. --ejBQO6RFNOdfKSiv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmgltPIACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DkqQf/REpQxgWVfq8b7aQzalvyecOuF4kgL/JR9uyKEG8EDkwpLRnT/+yxJmCX Dkw4A53gNv/cD2E1UWI2AYs6i4/rUScPzGsjtiUV5AUoDJ91LB2uxgHiSk/xFpck x6A37s+FfJYLx9Gmq8cfwVrl103CH7er2kqiadxUL0db4mPXvq/g1EPk2XmuP/Lz /dkbZtw92fLqWkofr/kiGGoKV9TKa0vlcVmunnaF1Pm14oN+cpTU3aAT58Ogi6Vn 1AuIHpgbH1fae6uL52xialrE8H3PVQF0KkkxyMPrSj+mSL17DDN3jDCXoz6Ypw2Y eJFtfBiL5D0nmaE7Z2CtBkgLq3LMow== =U5xD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ejBQO6RFNOdfKSiv--