mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, pcc@google.com, will@kernel.org,
	broonie@kernel.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	frederic@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io, huangxiaojia2@huawei.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, samuel.holland@sifive.com,
	palmer@rivosinc.com, charlie@rivosinc.com,
	thiago.bauermann@linaro.org, bgray@linux.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, puranjay@kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
	yang@os.amperecomputing.com, mbenes@suse.cz,
	joel.granados@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] support FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY feature
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 09:12:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCroCLuvhwnrnfjR@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507154654.1937588-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>

Gentle ping in case of forgoten...

> ARMv8.5 based processors introduce the Memory Tagging Extension (MTE) feature.
> MTE is built on top of the ARMv8.0 virtual address tagging TBI
> (Top Byte Ignore) feature and allows software to access a 4-bit
> allocation tag for each 16-byte granule in the physical address space.
> A logical tag is derived from bits 59-56 of the virtual
> address used for the memory access. A CPU with MTE enabled will compare
> the logical tag against the allocation tag and potentially raise an
> tag check fault on mismatch, subject to system registers configuration.
>
> Since ARMv8.9, FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY can be used to restrict raise of tag
> check fault on store operation only.
> For this, application can use PR_MTE_STORE_ONLY flag
> when it sets the MTE setting with prctl().
>
> This feature omits tag check for fetch/read operation.
> So it might be used not only debugging purpose but also be used
> by application requiring strong memory safty in normal env.
>
> Patch Sequences
> ================
>
> Patch #1 adds cpufeature FEAT_MTE_STORE_ONLY
>
> Patch #2 introduce new flag -- PR_MTE_STORE_ONLY
>
> Patch #3 support MTE_STORE_ONLY feature
>
> Patch #4 add HWCAP for MTE_STORE_ONLY
>
> Patch #5 adds mte store-only hwcap test
>
> Patch #6 preparation for adding mte store-only testcase
>
> Patch #7 adds mte store-only testcases
>
> Patch History
> ================
>
> v3 to v4:
>   - separate cpufeature and hwcap commit.
>   - add mte store-only testcases in check_mmap_options
>   - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/aApBk8eGA2Eo57fq@e129823.arm.com/
>
> v2 to v3:
>   - rebase to 6.15-rc1
>   - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250403174701.74312-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com/
>
> v1 to v2:
>   - add doc to elf_hwcaps.rst
>   - add MTE_STORE_ONLY hwcap test
>   - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250403142707.26397-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com/
>
> Note:
>   This patch based on
>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250507095757.1663684-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com/
>
> Yeoreum Yun (7):
>   arm64/cpufeature: add MTE_STORE_ONLY feature
>   prtcl: introduce PR_MTE_STORE_ONLY
>   arm64/kernel: support store-only mte tag check
>   arm64/hwcaps: add MTE_STORE_ONLY hwcaps
>   tools/kselftest: add MTE_STORE_ONLY feature hwcap test
>   kselftest/arm64/mte: preparation for mte store only test
>   kselftest/arm64/mte: add MTE_STORE_ONLY testcases
>
>  Documentation/arch/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst       |   3 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h                |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h            |   2 +
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h           |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c                |   9 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c                   |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c                       |  11 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c                   |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps                      |   1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/prctl.h                    |   2 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c     |   6 +
>  .../selftests/arm64/mte/check_buffer_fill.c   |  10 +-
>  .../selftests/arm64/mte/check_child_memory.c  |   4 +-
>  .../arm64/mte/check_hugetlb_options.c         |   6 +-
>  .../selftests/arm64/mte/check_ksm_options.c   |   2 +-
>  .../selftests/arm64/mte/check_mmap_options.c  | 116 ++++++++++++------
>  .../testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_prctl.c |  25 ++--
>  .../arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c          |   8 +-
>  .../selftests/arm64/mte/check_user_mem.c      |   2 +-
>  .../selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c     |  14 ++-
>  .../selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.h     |   3 +-
>  21 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>
> --
> LEVI:{C3F47F37-75D8-414A-A8BA-3980EC8A46D7}
>

--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-19  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07 15:46 Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-07 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64/cpufeature: add MTE_STORE_ONLY feature Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-07 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] prtcl: introduce PR_MTE_STORE_ONLY Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-07 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] arm64/kernel: support store-only mte tag check Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-07 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] arm64/hwcaps: add MTE_STORE_ONLY hwcaps Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-07 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] tools/kselftest: add MTE_STORE_ONLY feature hwcap test Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-07 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] kselftest/arm64/mte: preparation for mte store only test Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-07 15:46 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] kselftest/arm64/mte: add MTE_STORE_ONLY testcases Yeoreum Yun
2025-05-19  8:12 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aCroCLuvhwnrnfjR@e129823.arm.com \
    --to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=bgray@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io \
    --cc=huangxiaojia2@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®