From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB27B173 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2025 00:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748909160; cv=none; b=Q55KdCGWEoZT340mVWfUrmPIKVI8RbXgHSOhriSj5pJWutzvdWqhzky9S6L/vDJiHsZWsPZFfBCoND27g8ngeH2eqwqrUwr1EKuocrkxrWnLFTt2zNjAAO1tzr11S2MzVUSoxVqOCyD8v4RG2pcvygPX+jLrp4UBmfPjsnR2yRA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748909160; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vmtqTcSnZqXMWIeGRxSwwuim1Pws2pWkAXQ+gjyQeMw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=etTTNCiepoAchppX7hjHfelNZ1cH5dVXpSjgWWCWKE1Q1AAcgRgFQLkSpTd7GuM3lJWPiWoVf5gf0/0Jz9sJaJySqQ1tDfNurBLRtQ7fkenTdN1Bj2phhKTuLiF09NWDfItG/mrn/q61cFqqrb9uW/6YGv1U+iICLcwKsscBNgQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MauylUYL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MauylUYL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06658C4CEEB; Tue, 3 Jun 2025 00:05:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1748909160; bh=vmtqTcSnZqXMWIeGRxSwwuim1Pws2pWkAXQ+gjyQeMw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MauylUYLcJWYjTIUAARLzFj1UbfEFj3/m5650UlGQUwPgUFlsI9MG9oPBgmig0k47 u6ui4yZNzQtw7VJ01/40ejkY8QpoDKJTy0TlJH27NNr33HsXdEvQ3PJ9e1IexJdPup qrpsoeezokthQAWRydhytRgtTtBD6nw49j4laf1iZlAH75oWHEiWglEdteKMLjO3Ou C4lX1nAg+yq55ohe6A4/icLquEUtA+1AuNZnMHiYQQ3MCHivVqmMXB46GX8xfa9V+m ltCgvZouaeYD7UAe3Sj5zotUlgIR5sy2x3fdn610RN463t1B/vmkddB9t/itbNT3Z1 xBQ04RTKv7pzg== Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 14:05:58 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Joel Fernandes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , David Vernet , Andrea Righi , Changwoo Min Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] sched: Add support to pick functions to take rf Message-ID: References: <20250602180110.816225-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> <20250602180110.816225-2-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250602180110.816225-2-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Hello, On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > Some pick functions like the internal pick_next_task_fair() already take > rf but some others dont. We need this for scx's server pick function. > Prepare for this by having pick functions accept it. Hmm.. after the whole patch series is applied, pick_task_scx() still doesn't seem to use @rf. What am I missing? Thanks. -- tejun