From: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
To: Jerry C Chen/WYHQ/Wiwynn <Jerry_C_Chen@wiwynn.com>
Cc: "patrick@stwcx.xyz" <patrick@stwcx.xyz>,
Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam@mendozajonas.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] net/ncsi: fix buffer overflow in getting version id
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 23:15:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDTL0uWIgLRgyu6s@home.paul.comp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SEZPR04MB685354203C242413D1EBE96CB098A@SEZPR04MB6853.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Jerry,
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 07:32:26AM +0000, Jerry C Chen/WYHQ/Wiwynn wrote:
> Sorry for late replay, it takes some effort to change company policy of the proprietary.
I can imagine! However it's not necessary to send patches from
corporate e-mail address via the corporate mail server, you can just
send from your own personal account with the appropriate From:
specification to attribute it to your corporate address[0].
> For the questions:
Please consider just using standard inline method of replying in the
future, letting your MUA quote the original message for context
properly.
> 1. What upstream tree did you intend it for and why?
> - Linux mainline
> We are developing openBMC with kernel-6.6.
> For submitting patch to kernel-6.6 stable tree, it should exist in mainline first.
> Reference: https://github.com/openbmc/linux/commits/dev-6.6/
Indeed, and the process of submitting to mainline implies that for
each subsystem there's a tree which subsystem maintainer(s) use for
the integration and which is later offered as a the pull request for
the upcoming version, usually it's called {subsystem}-next (also such
trees get tested together being merged into linux-next regularly). I
guess in this case you should make sure your patch applies to net-next
(and makes sense there). Neither the current submission[1] nor the
previous one[2] were applicable (see "netdev/tree_selection success
Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply" and indeed I tried to
"git am" it manually to what was "net-next" back then and it failed.
> 2. Have you seen such cards in the wild? It wouldn't harm mentioning
> specific examples in the commit message to probably help people
> searching for problems specific to them later. You can also consider
> adding Fixes: and Cc: stable tags if this bugfix solves a real issue
> and should be backported to stable kernels.
> - This NIC is developed by META terminus team and the problematic string is:
> The channel Version Str : 24.12.08-000
> I will update it to commit message later.
I see, thank you. Sigh, this 12 characters limit doesn't seem to make
much sense, too restrictive to fit a useful part of "git describe
--tags" even, but it is what it is...
[0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#from-line
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20250515083448.3511588-1-Jerry_C_Chen@wiwynn.com/
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20250227055044.3878374-1-Jerry_C_Chen@wiwynn.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-26 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-15 8:34 Jerry C Chen
2025-05-15 9:04 ` Paul Fertser
2025-05-23 7:32 ` Jerry C Chen/WYHQ/Wiwynn
2025-05-26 20:15 ` Paul Fertser [this message]
2025-05-27 2:23 ` Jerry C Chen/WYHQ/Wiwynn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-27 5:50 Jerry C Chen
2025-02-27 8:55 ` Paul Fertser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aDTL0uWIgLRgyu6s@home.paul.comp \
--to=fercerpav@gmail.com \
--cc=Jerry_C_Chen@wiwynn.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick@stwcx.xyz \
--cc=sam@mendozajonas.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®